Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Low stack height
  • wrecker
    Free Member

    So I’m just about to push a button on a new bike. I’ve looked at the geo (they are seriously long bikes) and the medium looks fine for me.
    My only concern is around the stack height, which looks seriously low. I’m no geometry expert but this looks like it would make the bars potentially very low, but how would it translate on the trail?

    It’s making me question the size and maybe try and track down a large.

    tinribz
    Free Member

    Sounds like a test ride would be advisable.

    legend
    Free Member

    Buy the medium and lift the bars if you don’t like the front end height? Having them low should help it corner like a beast, might not feel so great when things get steep though

    davidtaylforth
    Free Member

    Depends how you like your bikes to ride. I personally hated super low front ends and flat bars, so I used to use 50mm risers (I’ve got some spare if you want them?). I found low front ends were harder to bunnyhop/manual/jump etc. which was the main reason I rode! although I was used to a BMX with 9 inch rise bars, so that could be why.

    honourablegeorge
    Full Member

    You’re worried that the bars are too far from you, so you want a large, to make them even further away? 🙂

    Personally, Id take the low front end, and raise it with bars/stem/spacers if needed.

    wrecker
    Free Member

    It’s height, not distance george.

    zero-cool
    Free Member

    Stem spacers and riser bars if necessary

    honourablegeorge
    Full Member

    wrecker – Member
    It’s height, not distance george.

    Yeah, but the two are very closely related.

    For me, lower gives you more flexibility, so would choose that every time – although a complete bike might not give you the steerer length to play with, so it’d have to be risers,

    wrecker
    Free Member

    Yeah, but the two are very closely related.

    Of course, but both result in different body positions.

    wrecker
    Free Member

    Sounds like a test ride would be advisable.

    I’ve had a shimmy around on a medium, and it felt fine. I’m right between sizes and turned off the large as it’s suitable for up to 6ft 4. I’m a knacker under 6ft. My instinct says that with the medium being a long bike anyway (444mm reach; longer than most large bikes), it’ll be more suitable but the stack is low.

    davidtaylforth
    Free Member

    50mm Sunline risers; I’ll stick em in the post for you if you like!

    legend
    Free Member

    “Suitable for” is a load of bollocks. ride what feels best, not what literature says

    chiefgrooveguru
    Full Member

    Low stack height is almost always a good thing – it allows the rider so much more adjustment in terms of how the bike fits them, both by varying bar height through spacers, stem and rise and also by sizing up if a longer frame is desired (assuming the seat tube is suitably short too). With a tall stack height you have very limited adjustment to get the bars lower. It’s easier to weight the front wheel with lower bars (better for corners) but easier to lift the front wheel with higher bars (better for jumping).

    Also bear in mind that reach and stack tend to be quoted with one A-C length of fork and the reality is often different – I’ve seen a lot of bikes having their geometry quoted with say a 150mm Pike and then most frames being sold with 160mm Pikes – that instantly increases stack by 10mm over what the chart says.

    wrecker
    Free Member

    Cheers chief. Medium ordered. Thanks for the help/validation 😀

    VanHalen
    Full Member

    is stack bb to top of head tube? otherwise its just more biking bollox as its a total variable.

    chiefgrooveguru
    Full Member

    Yes, centre of BB to centre of top of head tube, vertically. Reach is the horizontal equivalent.

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)

The topic ‘Low stack height’ is closed to new replies.