- This topic has 78 replies, 40 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by chestrockwell.
-
LIb Dems – remember them?
-
jambalayaFree Member
Green Tory party (they did say they were green once I recall) to account
Of course the Tories are Green, they even have a tree as their logo and everyfink 😉
unklehomeredFree MemberNo Labour aren’t extremists, but they are in shambolic disarray, at odds with their own membership and incapable of presenting anything coherent to the nation.
jambalayaFree Memberthat such labels are only applied by desperate/deluded/ignorant/paranoid right-wingers.
McDonnell called hinself a Marxist. You won’t find many developed nation Finance Minister wannabees are Marxists. Labour have been taken over by Socialist Workers Party / Alliance Workers Liberty types. Was speaking to some lifelong Labour party members yesterday and they are in despair. Local party overtaken by radical Momentum entryists. The one sitting MP in South will be deselected and Labour will as a result lose the seat (their view)
aPFree MemberI phoned up the Liberal party offices to get tickets for their conference.
They told me “We’ve sold out”.
I replied, “Yes, I know that – but have you any tickets left?”unklehomeredFree MemberI replied, “Yes, I know that – but have you any tickets left?”
hope you have a day job. 😉
martinhutchFull MemberAnd you genuinely think the LibDems will offer that?
Do you not remember what happened when they were in the coalition?
Sadly for Labour, coalition government is pretty much the only way they will have a sniff of power in the next two decades, so they better start hoping that the LibDems start picking up a bit.
squirrelkingFree MemberWon’t vote for them until they start making an effort to field people who actually represent the constituencies they run in, one of our last candidates was from Edinburgh FFS. Oh, and some compaigning would be nice.
As for the coalition –
With Tories – damned
With Labour – damned
Refuse to play – damnedIt was a no-win situation, anyone who can confuse compromise with selling out clearly doesn’t understand how a coalition works. Maybe they overstepped the mark but what did they get in return?
aracerFree MemberBecause they can.
I voted Tory in the past (there I’ve said it), and even if my views hadn’t changed markedly I’d really struggle to vote for them right now, and for those voters with positions like I used to have the Lib Dems offer a genuine option. Labour might not be extreme, but some of the current senior members certainly have views which would seem so to the middle of the ground voters who swing elections – they after all are the ones who matter, not you lot who would vote for a monkey with a red rosette.
Though I’m kind of relieved to see I’m not alone in my opinion of the Lib Dems, sometimes I’ve felt like a lone voice defending them from the big deal being made about the tuition fees thing (for anybody who wants to argue, I’ll still make the case that the current system is far more fair and progressive than the one in place in 2010).
The interesting thing about this result isn’t that it shows a resurgence of the Lib Dem vote – for those suggesting it’s disappointing that they didn’t win, was there ever a realistic prospect of that? A recovery to the share of the vote they had when Cameron was first elected is a good result. The bigger thing though is that they now seem electable again – a vote for them won’t seem like such a waste as it did at the last GE.
rosscoreFree MemberaP – Member
I phoned up the Liberal party offices to get tickets for their conference.
They told me “We’ve sold out”.
I replied, “Yes, I know that – but have you any tickets left?”POSTED 26 MINUTES AGO # REPORT-POST 😆 😆 😆
aracerFree MemberNot quite that bad here, but still a shit candidate conducting negative campaigning to follow a shit candidate doing even worse negative campaigning at the previous GE. I haven’t felt able to vote for either of those, when even a bland but competent candidate might have got my vote.
AristotleFree MemberThough I’m kind of relieved to see I’m not alone in my opinion of the Lib Dems, sometimes I’ve felt like a lone voice defending them from the big deal being made about the tuition fees thing (for anybody who wants to argue, I’ll still make the case that the current system is far more fair and progressive than the one in place in 2010).
Quite.
The Lib Dems were held to a higher level of account than the other parties and seen as different. In fairness, they were a good coaliton partner.
Voting Labour because you grandparents were coalminers or dockers or voting Conservative because your parents did doesn’t make much sense to me.
JunkyardFree MemberIt was a no-win situation,
t was not really they could have helped them in a minority govt. they played their card specataculiarily poorly y any[ in fact almost all] measure.
anyone who can confuse compromise with selling out clearly doesn’t understand how a coalition works.
Please list all the things the tories sold out and all the things the lib dems sold out on
Basically the tories moderated their position the lib dems reversed theirs and did the opposite be it austerity or fees etc.Maybe they overstepped the mark but what did they get in return?
the kicking they deserved from the electorate?
I agree they did some ok things- pupil premium for example- but essentially they capitulated on their principles and their platform to get their hands on power to show they could govern and to get a PR vote
It has spectacularly backfired for them as a vote for the lib dems is like rolling a dice – what will you get ? who knowsI voted Tory in the past
Spits on ground, turns back to him wanders off muttering you are dead to me
unklehomeredFree Memberfor anybody who wants to argue, I’ll still make the case that the current system is far more fair and progressive than the one in place in 2010
This. I’d swap my 2000 SL agreement for the current one if I had the choice.
teamhurtmoreFree MemberBloody good job they backed down on tuition fees. At last we are moving to a situation where the real value of tertiary education can be assessed, proper competition may in time be allowed, more flexible course structures introduced (eg 2 not 3 years) and companies who value the education received will increasingly support those who seek it (bursuries, dedicated degrees etc).
Progress may be slow, but its coming….and the LD are not in the way there.
clodhopperFree Member“Bloody good job they backed down on tuition fees”
So, you’re against free universal education? Why, exactly?
Do you have a degree, and if so, did you pay tuition fees?
footflapsFull MemberDont’ understand the concept of coalition?
Watch Borgen
Worth watching anyway, tis very good.
And
Birgitte’sSidse Babett Knudsen is in Westworld….km79Free MemberThe lib-dems could have went into a coalition with labour in 2010 but picked the tories instead, I don’t think they should be forgiven so soon.
aracerFree MemberA coalition with Labour would have given them 315 seats in total, still 11 short of a majority in parliament. They’d have had trouble getting anything done.
chakapingFree MemberThey had their moment and they blew it in spectacular fashion.
No use crying now, they won’t be trusted again.
corrodedFree MemberCould you imagine going into a coalition with Gordon Brown?! Ditto Corbyn. As coalitions go, it wasn’t such a bad one.
teamhurtmoreFree MemberDo you have a degree, and if so, did you pay tuition fees?
First time no. Crazy situation. Others who didn’t have the same benefit paid for me. Absurd wasn’t it? I had no idea what value of my education was worth. Why should I? I didn’t pay and there was no direct relationship between me as the consumer and the profs as the suppliers. Hence, there was little incentive for the staff to focus on my needs. They were paid to do research and guess what they focused on?
Second time. Yes 100% plus opportunity cost of not working. So I was v focused on the value and whether I made the correct choice. Much better situation. The profs were very focused.
slowoldmanFull MemberCould you imagine going into a coalition with Gordon Brown?! Ditto Corbyn. As coalitions go, it wasn’t such a bad one.
I think that was exactly the problem they faced and, let’s face it, there wasn’t a lot of difference between Blair/Brown Labour and the Tories.
Once in coalition though I think they should have been a bit tougher in sticking to their guns.
JunkyardFree Memberthey had more than the Tories though and you forget the SNP 😉
True but they really could have bargained harder by simply not going into coalition as the Tories could do NOTHING without their help. They should have just let it be a minority govt but he wanted to show statesman like qualities and that they could lead the country. This blindsided him to the fact he also had to have principles and , however vaguely, stick to them
He played his hand terribly- FFS he only held onto his seat due to tories voting for him out of gratitude
SO everyone hates him but Tories basicallyWorth noting the lib dems also lost seats on the 2010 election
A part if me feels sorry for him and them as they were honourably inept rather than dishonourably corrupt.
Bad decisions made for the right reasons basically but they deserved the electoral shoeing they recieved and clegg should have gone
DaffyFull MemberI’ve always voted Lib Dem. I formally joined the party after the debacle of the Referendum after campaigning for Remain in Bath and Bristol.
I’ve recently watched Nick Clegg speak in Chipping Sodbury. He’s a powerful orator and a great spokesman for the EU, the perfect counterpoint to Farage. I don’t know too much about Tim Farron, but fully support their policies and stand by their track record.
We need change in this country, intelligent, rational change. Labour had their shot at it with some successes, but are a lost Party at the moment. I’ll do EVERYTHING I can to help them win even a sizeable minority during the next GE.
The one good thing to come out of Brexit, and the tin hat wearing, sceptical part of me believes this was the Tories plan all along, is the death of UKIP, to whom the Tories were losing a lot of votes. No longer. UKIP voters will vote Tory (mostly) rational/remain Tories will vote Lib Dem. labour remainders may also vote lib dem unless the Reds can reorganise. SNP…who knows, but the LDs and the SNP have a fair amount of common ground…
MoreCashThanDashFull MemberI’m a lapsed Tory, but becoming increasingly Liberal in recent years. The Tories gave completely lost touch with the world they rule, refuse to accept that the market can’t fix everything. Labour remain a financial liability to me, and are too keen on state control and intervention for my liking.
LibDems offer a mature reasoned middle ground to me. Plenty on here will disagree with me of course.
shermer75Free MemberReckon I’ll be voting for them next election, partly because they seem to be the party most opposed to brexit but mostly because they’re the least bat-shit crazy 🙂
teamhurtmoreFree MemberMCTD you seem to have a different take away to many commentators who conclude that May’s conference speech was characterised by a level of interventionism not seen in a Tory leader for a long, long time.
Blimey, she even hinted that independence for the Bank of England was not a given, Perhaps Jacob R-M wrote that bit.
binnersFull MemberMy sentiments exactly shermer.
Both labour and Tory leaders appear to be little more than mouthpieces for the most foaming-at-the-mouth, batshit mental headbangers in their respective parties.
The Lib Dems look pretty well placed to get back their traditional ‘none of the above thanks’ vote
Who’d have thought that would happen so soon. Just goes to show how much the main parties have so fully descended into their own particular form of collective self-absorbed insanity, both equally repellent to the general electorate
rkk01Free MemberPerhaps Jacob R-M wrote that bit.
In what parallel universe is there a constituency so detached from reality that J R-M would get elected in a public vote?
The mind truly boggles 🙁
teamhurtmoreFree MemberT Farron is on HIGNFY – Cleggie last week, the LDs are on a roll
J R-M is great company FWIW – or used to be when our careers crossed many years ago!
clodhopperFree Member“J R-M is great company FWIW”
Unsurprising that you’d consider someone who consistently votes against equality and human rights, gay marriage and equal gay rights, not to mention stating he’d vote for Trump if he was a US citizen, to be ‘great company’.
clodhopperFree MemberFirst time no
So; you’ve benefited from a universally free higher education system, yet you favour the privatisation of higher education (which has been proven to exacerbate inequality). OK.
You know, you could pay the government an amount equivalent to what anyone entering university now would have to. You say you want to actively help others; if you paid the equivalent of the current tuition fees, you’d in effect be helping subsidise the education of others. What a great idea! So you’d have the ability to help others in need!
If only that kind of concept was a political and economic ideology…
MoreCashThanDashFull MemberTHM – yes, May could be a force for change in the Tory party. Whether she will, or do it quickly, remains to be seen.
binnersFull MemberA force for change? Very likely. In the worst way imaginable. John Harris in today’s Guardian made an interesting point about those at the top of the Tory Party at the monent, of which May personifies. As does Corbyn for Labour
Both are ‘led by people who are neither intellectually curious, nor shaped by the great technological convulsions that have shaped the last 25 years”
And that’s why we are where we are. That’s a big opportunity for the Lib Dems
chestrockwellFull MemberIt was good to see the BBC focus on the Libs surging past Labour this morning rather than them cutting a 25k Tory majority by 20k. Anyone would have thought Labour lost a huge amount of votes compared to last time. 😐
The topic ‘LIb Dems – remember them?’ is closed to new replies.