What does “imperious” build quality mean? Built like an emperor?
I have a Tower camera. A copy of a Leica 3 made in 1951, I think, with a lens by some upstart company in Japan. It just says “Nikkor”. It’s very nicely made – almost like a watch. Japan had an emperor and he was small. I think my Tower might be imperious.
The reason it puts me off is I think photography should be about the photographer not the camera.
Huh? You want all cameras to look the same?
I mean, the Leica system is very different in technology than many others, of course it looks different, right? And if you like it, then would you not use it to your advantage?
Disclaimer – I don’t have a real Leica, just a smartphone with a Leica-designed camera system and software.
Thankyou GT for explaining the “Leica Look”. The reason it puts me off is I think photography should be about the photographer not the camera.
I prefer the William Eggleston look or the Wolfgang Tillmans look etc.
Well I definitely applaud that sentiment! I don’t think the two have to be mutually exclusive though. I think that bonding with your camera, developing the muscle memory for it so that you can shoot really quickly is a key part of creating your own look. It’s quite profound how one camera can make you shoot a completely different way to another. But yes, I agree 100% with you’ the camera is just a tool.