BBC link
“Road casualties in Scotland down 10% as pedestrian deaths fall
The number of people killed and injured on Scotland’s roads fell by 10% last year thanks to a reduction in pedestrian fatalities.
But there was an increase in the number of cyclists, motorcyclists and car users killed.
Total casualties were down from 12,722 to 11,493 – the lowest since records began – according to Transport Scotland Statisticians.
Fatalities fell by 3% from 178 to 172 and serious injuries by 16% to 1,667.
Of the nine children killed, five were walking, two were cycling and two were travelling by car.
Overall, 1,062 children were injured or killed on the roads, a fall of 9%.
Casualty numbers for all modes of transport fell, including 12% for pedestrians, 11% for motorcyclists and 3% for cyclists.”
So i went over to transport scotland and downloaded the stats
first thing is apparent is they looked at the brighter side of the stats, but what is not shown is 2012 was in itself was a much bigger year than before for casualties for riders – probably due to the fact of the increase in popularity of cycling, so more people on the road.
if you actually took it over the 5 year average figures they themselves have produced they reveal a much disturbing figure – I’ll try and paste it in here :
Pedal cycle (merging built up and non built up casualty figure)
Year / killed / serious
2004-08 average / 9 / 134
2011 / 7 / 156
2012 / 9 / 168
2013 / 13 / 148
% change on 2012 /+44% /-12%
on 04-08 average /+41% /+10%
a 44% or 41% increase in deaths 2013 is the 3rd BIGGEST year in deaths in the total since records began around 1990.
despite “the XXXX millions of investment in cycle lanes and investment”
we get spouted at year upon year, death upon death.
the only way they got that -3% figure was to add a variety of figures
of all injuries and compared it to 2012 only (906 compared to 882 = -3%)
almost every other figure showed an increase.