Breaking the mold here, I buy it and enjoy it – though would be the 1st to say it’s not the best out there..
BUT I enjoy it, as it has no ‘lifestyle’ crap that I’m not interested in, the occasional ‘epic’ article is more than enough. Shows me the latest bit’s of kit, we all like to drool over, & give for the most part decent advice IME.
Yes it the same old articles regurgitated, but really what long standing magazine isn’t? Yes it the same bike reviews, but again they come from test fleet supplied by the manufacturers, do you really think STW Mag gets anything they don’t?
As for the occasionaly spelling mistake, mislabelled picture/wrong picture, it’s a MTB magazine not a scientific journal, some of you need to stop taking yourselves so seriously.