Hi,
I`m considering buying my first full suspension frame, having blasted around quite happily up until now on hardtails with 130mm forks. I went to Morzine for a week with Alpine Elements,and hired one of their camber comps and rode it very, very hard. In short I loved the bike in the medium size- despite several scary moments where i confused the basic ario shock on fast open sections over braking bumps, it was far more capable and chuckable than I ever expected a 120mm bike to be.
Camber elite and pro frames that have come up recently with the fox shock have gone for a lot of money, so what I want to know from people whove ridden all these bikes is just how similar a 2009 120mm stumpjumper would be to a 2012 camber? Ive checked the geometry and dimensions on the specialized website, and they look almost identical. Knowing that people will pay a premium for the latest model (and that the camber with its inline shock is probably in most peoples eyes better looking), does it make more sense to buy the older frame if I find one in good condition? And now the big second question- should I step up and buy the 140mm stumpjumper instead of either of these in the hope that I`ll find it is even more of a do-it-all bike, or would I find the xc capability of the camber that I enjoyed so much on the big black run around the back of Les Gets compromised by the extra travel, burliness and slackness?
I know you lot love to get stuck into this kind of debate, so what do you think??