I mean obviously it changes with wet vs dry trail conditions, but what’s the consensus (I know there won’t be one but what the hell) on the threshold from mincing to pinning…?
In order to get a figure in MPH I think you need to multiply the amount of gnarr you are shredding by the quantity of steeze exhibited and then divide that by your epicness.
pinning it has nothing to do with speed, it’s like nailing it but over a longer period, it’s hitting it up in a no-nonsense efficient and authoritative way that gives the appearance of being fast but isn’t necessarily.
I’m not sure about pinning it but I learnt from experience when approaching a wide loomy corner an it called for a bit of foot out flat out action I just couldn’t quite get my center of gravity low enough until I got my ‘balls out’ it all made sense after that
In order to get a figure in MPH I think you need to multiply the amount of gnarr you are shredding by the quantity of steeze exhibited and then divide that by your epicness.
This is dumb because as your epicness goes up your mph goes down.
In order to get a figure in MPH I think you need to multiply the amount of gnarr you are shredding by the quantity of steeze exhibited and then divide that by your epicness.
This is dumb because as your epicness goes up your mph goes down.
In order to get a figure in MPH I think you need to multiply the amount of gnarr you are shredding by the quantity of steeze exhibited and then divide that by your epicness.
This is dumb because as your epicness goes up your mph goes down.
Not at all. Its very simple.epicness is measured In the same way as a volume control on a proper amp as a reverse scale. So the more epic you are the less your gnar is attenuated until you reach 0 and then you are infinitely epic. Which im sure we’ll all agree is the often default position for many of us singletrackers.
I don’t think the words for that run by Danny Hart have been invented yet… But surely nailing is more committed than pinning, and therefore simply more awesome, by about 3.7?