As an example, one of my colleagues is signed to a prominent uk electronic label, Rephlex. In the early 90's, he could have made enough money to spend more time making music and improving his studio. Now he cannot, and that is a shame.
And the problem is that there are probably 1,000s of people just like you downloading for free for a bit of free publicity. 😉
a real musician will play whether they get paid or not, it's the music that's important
Well, that's just great for you, isn't it? The musician can keep working his bollocks off and you can get the music you like for free. Why should s/he have to work unrewarded? Don't you think there'd be more time to make better and more interesting music if the musician didn't have to, for instance, spend time fixing bikes and painting houses because of sales lost to piracy?
I think you know what was meant. As I understand it money is not the only reward for an artist. As I said before it's the astist's choice whether the music is released for free or not.
Can just imagine the reaction around here if it was suggested that sweaty IT merchants shouldn't get paid for what they do – after all, people still produce open source software without getting paid, don't they? So why should anyone get paid for it? "It's the software that counts".
Maybe it should be free judging by some of the crap that's written and charged for! 😉