He is correct pity about his choice of words, as that just gives the politically correct middle class (so called) liberals a way of calling UKIP racist.
No he is not correct and he could easily avoid the charge of racism by simply not using language with racist overtones or apologising when he does it. Even UKIP has told him to moderate it
If you given aid for the poor they just reduce there government spending on the needy by the same amount. India is prime example.
Proof please of this linear relationship in all countries and India in particular- ie its not true what you say
If we are going to give aid at least we should choose what to give it for AND to be on the ground to see that’s what it is being used for?
Yes I am sure the govt dept/minister had not thought of that bit and they just draw things out of hat raffle style
As per the other thread the issue of worthy of debate but if you think language like he used and claims such as yours help the debate they dont
People will draw conclusions about your motivations if you use language like that, defend the language or use made up facts and non truths to support your/his view.
EDIT:
After all its what the majority of people think (the money is being wasted)
Just because it is what you think that does not mean the majority do.
I enjoy it when folk insist t hey speak for them majority – even more so when they speak for the silent majority
All the studies seem to agree that 6 out of 10 agree it is morally right to give aid though they may debate the amount
http://www.ippr.org/images/media/files/publication/2012/06/public-attitudes-aid-development_June2012_9297.pdf