• This topic has 5 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by jsm.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • hans dampf frame rub, nobby nics any narrower?
  • jsm
    Full Member

    I’ve been running HD 2.35 for the last year or so. I’ve noticed that the tyre’s been rubbing the frame. Any suggestions for an alpine suitable skinnier rear tyre, lift assisted xc/light dh. I’ve been running evo snakeskin pacestar on the rear.

    nobby nics 2.35 any narrower?
    The HD on flow ex come up like high roller 2.5.

    yorkshire89
    Free Member

    A 2.25″ nobby nic should be fine, thats what I’m using, a HD has started to rub my chainstay too.

    mcnultycop
    Full Member

    I went from a 2.4 NN to a 2.35 HD and the HD is miles bigger.

    woody2000
    Full Member

    A 2.4 NN is slightly narrower than the 2.35 Wicked Will it replaced if that helps! 🙂

    Yetiman
    Free Member

    I’m running a 2.35” HD up front, and a 2.4 NN at the back, and although I’ve never measured them the NN does appear to be slightly narrower due to its squarer profile.

    jsm
    Full Member

    just ordered a 2.25, I’ll see if it’s too narrow when it comes.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

The topic ‘hans dampf frame rub, nobby nics any narrower?’ is closed to new replies.