Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 122 total)
  • God – he's smashing isn't he?
  • Mark
    Full Member

    This thread is on the edge of being closed and there are some contributors who are on the verge of being banned for quite some time.

    MrWoppit
    Free Member

    Is this to be another example of what you term 'muscular debate'?

    No. I'm taking the piss.

    MrWoppit
    Free Member

    Oh, O.K. I wouldn't want that again. I shall manfully resist all further provocations to combat and not mention "spiritual" matters again. For quite some time.

    MrKmkII
    Free Member

    Talkemada, did you actually read that einstein quote you posted? 😆

    barnsleymitch
    Free Member

    Fair play, I suppose I was asking for it.

    silverpigeon
    Free Member

    Fighting AND religion – who would ever have put those two together?

    simonfbarnes
    Free Member

    Surely applying a sexual preposition to god is highly inappropriate ? God must be an 'it' (or if a Trinity, 'them')

    crikey
    Free Member

    See, you've woken him up as well!

    Talkemada
    Free Member

    Talkemada, did you actually read that einstein quote you posted?

    Yes, I did. Einstein states that he believes in 'Spinoza's God', or 'Nature'. This has been (mis)interpreted as Eintein not believing in any God, and atheists often gleefully claim Einstein as 'one of them', but this is not true, and I don't think Einstein claimed to be an atheist.

    I myself believe in a similar concept; to me, 'God' is not some 'being' comprehendible in Human terms, but perhaps the whole meaning, reason and energy behind the existence of everything. It works for me.

    barnsleymitch
    Free Member

    I thought that said 'proposition' at first 😳

    Talkemada
    Free Member

    What is a 'Resident Grumpy'? Is it some form of exalted membership status? How does one attain such an ethereal position? 😀

    Oh, and we should all try to respect one another a bit more. Please, enough with the name calling, eh? This has been a fascinating, enjoyable and highly stimulating 'discussion'. Let's keep it that way!

    tazzymtb
    Full Member

    people get so heated about the silliest of things.Life really is too short for all this s**t so may I just say to all of the STW collective whatever you believe, in the words of Bill and Ted "Be excellent to each other. And… PARTY ON, DUDES!"

    crikey
    Free Member

    I suspect one achieves Resident Grumpiness after spending too much time producing a mag and running a forum for what occasionally seems to be a bunch of ingrates…

    gab344
    Free Member

    Down with this sort of thing.

    tazzymtb
    Full Member

    and that's even to the moderators who make the thought police from 1984 seem reasonable xx

    rs
    Free Member

    what existed before our know universe was created? I can never get my head around it, for something to be created there must have been something before it to create it and something before that….. an on and on and on……

    MrKmkII
    Free Member

    Talkemada – now i see! i quite like spinoza's panpsychism. i just don't see 'god' in it 🙂

    simonfbarnes
    Free Member

    What is a 'Resident Grumpy'? Is it some form of exalted membership status? How does one attain such an ethereal position?

    not so much membership as ownership 🙂 Achieved by starting your own popular mountain bike magazine ?

    MrWoppit
    Free Member

    rs – Member

    what existed before our know universe was created? I can never get my head around it, for something to be created there must have been something before it to create it and something before that….. an on and on and on……

    Yes. It's a brain twister. Try imagining nothing. Not nothing as in "the blackness of space without matter", because space itself is a "something". I mean, actual NOTHING. I tried it once and I felt like my brain was trying to turn inside out.

    As to what was it? Well – the answer of course is, we don't know.

    Yet. :mrgreen:

    westkipper
    Free Member

    One can debate the existance of the God-erator
    But not the existance of the mod-erator. 😉

    nickc
    Full Member

    He's the landlord of the pub your "drinking" in, if you understand the terrible metaphor

    simonralli2
    Free Member

    Another way to look at it is to say that consciousness is primary, and that out of consciousness is manifested matter. That physicists and scientists insist that matter is primary and that somehow consciousness arises out of matter is in fact a metaphysical assumption. Science has naff all to say about consciousness and can not at present explain it.

    FeeFoo
    Free Member

    [/quote] what existed before our know universe was created? I can never get my head around it, for something to be created there must have been something before it to create it and something before that….. an on and on and on……

    It shows what a nonsense our notion of time and cause and effect are.

    crikey
    Free Member

    Does there have to be a before?
    We are basically monkeys, evolved monkeys, but monkeys nonetheless, and we think in pretty straight lines, so the idea of nothing at all is pretty far out…
    Hence, I hesitate to suggest, religion and the persistence of the spiritual..

    westkipper
    Free Member

    I think that science tries very hard to explain consciousness, though the study is relatively young, and mostly a concern for biologists, not physicists. The fact that something is hard to explain, does not mean that its not worth trying.
    I haven't heard of anything concrete from religion at all.

    rs
    Free Member

    Does there have to be a before?

    How can there not be? If something exists now there must have been something that existed to create it before. I don't believe there could ever have been nothing but then I can't explain that whatever holds our universe just exists infinitely 😕

    westkipper
    Free Member

    Equally though, there also HAS to be, logically, 'a before god'

    simonralli2
    Free Member

    There does not have to be a before if time does not exist. If time is just a phenomena of our limited perceptual capabilities, then there only ever is the now. A few physicists have developed quantum theories that take time out of the equation so to speak.

    Talkemada
    Free Member

    Talkemada – now i see! i quite like spinoza's panpsychism. i just don't see 'god' in it

    God's just a word, though, used to describe the indescribable. Various attempts have been made to reify God, but there's never been a universal consensus, hence all the arguments…

    simonralli2
    Free Member

    Exactly.

    The tao which is named as the tao is not the tao!

    simonfbarnes
    Free Member

    Does there have to be a before?
    How can there not be?

    it seems no particular contradiction for time to have started – after all, the only alternative was for it always to have been, which is just as incomprehensible (to me at least). To my mind creation and god/s are kind of irrelevant to us being here now – we're in the time that we have so we might as well make the most of it!

    buzz-lightyear
    Free Member

    It maybe that conciousness and self are illusions or properties that evolved to improve the performance of the species. Religion maybe too. As maybe belief in father christmas.

    As a religious person I find it interesting the length people go to prevent their kids finding out about the truth of Santa claus when they scoff at the value in having faith in God. 🙂

    there was a remark earlier about God being worthess. Not to me it isn't. But I respect that your experiences might be different to mine. Perhaps you could reciprocate by not being quite so rude?

    westkipper
    Free Member

    I notice many with strongly spiritual beliefs like to mention quantum physics as a 'science crutch' to strengthen their arguments.
    That doesn't mean too much though, even quantum physicists are not blind to the loops their theories (please note) are tying them in, and the close resemblance to philosophy
    Much of quantum mechanics is very hypothetical, and utterly untestable, so its maybe not the best science to quote.

    rs
    Free Member

    it seems no particular contradiction for time to have started – after all, the only alternative was for it always to have been, which is just as incomprehensible (to me at least).

    I agree,it is all incomprehensible, interesting to think about though.

    To my mind creation and god/s are kind of irrelevant to us being here now – we're in the time that we have so we might as well make the most of it!

    I agree with this too 🙂

    simonfbarnes
    Free Member

    It maybe that conciousness and self are illusions or properties that evolved to improve the performance of the species

    but what does that mean ? Surely for there to be an illusion, there must be something having the illusion – so all the idea achieves is a shift of the location of the consciousness. In any case, I don't think it matters – if the illusion is as realistic and selfconsistent as it appears, it'll do for me and I shall not trouble over who is having it 🙂 Descartes has it.

    silverpigeon
    Free Member

    Oh FFS! This thread has gone from the ridiculous to the sublime.

    Let's have the fighting back!

    saladdodger
    Free Member

    heard about him but I have never met him

    Who the Fug is he, this god geeza btw

    Talkemada
    Free Member

    Let's have the fighting back!

    Nah, let's all drop some acid, and, like get spiritual, man…

    MrWoppit
    Free Member

    silverpigeon – Member

    Oh FFS! This thread has gone from the ridiculous to the sublime.

    Let's have the fighting back!

    I refer you to the comment from the Honourable Member for Grumpy (South).

    anonymouse
    Free Member

    How about a group hug then?

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 122 total)

The topic ‘God – he's smashing isn't he?’ is closed to new replies.