Yeah I've tried it on F errr 10 or 11 IIRC with the same shots, I get the same result, and I tried F22 out in Mugdock, trying to get the castle across the water, swept the entire run through from 5.6 to 22, no improvement. I chose the fairly large aperture in the plank shots to make the focal plane readily identifiable against the brickwork, I wasnt expecting it to be almost out of the image as it was in a couple of them. The SLR is a lot more sensitive to aperture than my P&S, thats for sure!
Yeah, the camera place is AJ Johnstone – they were the one one to show up on canon's site as approved, but I'm cringing at the possible cost if I take it to him, and I dont want him to match the body to the lens if the lens is at fault instead. I should probably just take it down and explain that to him, instead of waffling about it, I just dont like taking up a busy chaps time when I'm trying to avoid too much expense! I know it's possible to correct he body if it FF or BF with an adjustment screw behind the mirror, I'm happy to do that, but ideally I need to know that it's the body before I do that, or all future lenses will not match lol.