Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 110 total)
  • Fracking in Lancashire
  • cchris2lou
    Full Member

    Just been approved by government, overturning local council ruling.

    fadda
    Full Member

    I can’t claim to be any kind of expert, and I understand that we need to meet the demand for energy, but this just strikes me as a bad idea…

    project
    Free Member

    It had to a lot of large companies are going to make a huge amount of money out of it and sod the people who live locally, there houses are going to be worthless, as subsidence /noise starts ,then theres the pollution aspect, and transportation problem,s etc.

    Thing is the majority of us plebs never wanted it, and will never accept it.

    kayla1
    Free Member

    [video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orrde9vheRE[/video]

    Very sad news 🙁

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    A sad day.
    Glad I am north of the border again (for the moment).

    mikey74
    Free Member

    And the award for the most expected announcement of the day goes to……..

    Ridiculous decision, but inevitable, unfortunately.

    wwaswas
    Full Member

    It’s ok, they’ll be checking for earthquakes…

    thisisnotaspoon
    Free Member

    Much as I probably won’t get any sympathy but the other day on another forum I got lambasted for buying “cheap Chinese steel”.

    No one ever said “don’t buy cheap Saudi oil” or “Don’t buy cheap American Ethane”. In fact I can almost guarantee that most people have seen petrol at £1-£1.10 and done a little happy dance.

    Pictures of two things that are regular at the moment (that’s American gas being imported as it’s cheaper and more plentiful than the North Sea).

    And (I don’t have a photo of me at the job centre but you get the idea)

    binners
    Full Member

    It was patently obvious from the off that there was no way that the concerns of some uppity northerners were going to get in the way of this governments mates making shitloads of cash.

    They changed the law specifically so they could overrule Lancashire council. They don’t give a flying **** about us, up here. Especially if we’re inconveniently in the way of their money-making plans.

    I don’t believe for a second that fracking will reduce our energy bills. Our energy market is too dysfunctional for that. It’ll just allow the usual suspects to make even more money.

    And theres no way on earth that any of the communities up here that are going to be effected by all of this are going to see any benefits whatsoever.

    We’ve just been well and truly ****ed over! Again!!

    thisisnotaspoon
    Free Member

    We’ve just been well and truly ****ed over! Again!!

    Said the Brazilian tribe as they watch another tree felled to make paper for one of Binners prints.

    I don’t believe for a second that fracking will reduce our energy bills. Our energy market is too dysfunctional for that. It’ll just allow the usual suspects to make even more money.

    I refer the honourable gentlemen to my previous comment about the price of petrol being about 40% less than it was a few years ago.

    km79
    Free Member

    RIP Lancashire.

    ehrob
    Full Member

    Big business over local people once again.

    This and Hinckley C pretty much sums up the Tories ideological hatred of renewable energy. Assuming Brexit is now inevitable there is going to be much more of this.

    aP
    Free Member

    It won;t be that long before we reopen the coal mines and start building coal fired power plants. Fracking will seem like clean energy at that point.

    thisisnotaspoon
    Free Member

    It won;t be that long before we reopen the coal mines and start building coal fired power plants. Fracking will seem like clean energy at that point.

    Straw-man / hyperbole.

    IF this was the result of oil hitting £200/bl again and energy was in short supply, then yes, coal might be an economic option if we were building the power stations to burn it in or the coke furnaces in S.Wales/Teesside were running.

    But it’s not and they’re not. So there’s neither the economic case or the demand for coal. And with the government refusing to give CCS the go ahead it’s unlikely to change (although a few projects are still progressing with private funding).

    Fracking is new technology that’s actually relatively cheap.

    eddie11
    Free Member

    So far in the Uk the case for fracking is more about cheaper raw materials for the domestic chemical industry rather than as a fuel for electricity generation. Grangemouth, Runcorn, Teesside etc. Will gobble the stuff up. Like opencast The jobs getting the stuff out of the ground will be negligible.

    dovebiker
    Full Member

    Amused that this is somehow being presented as a ‘blight’ on Blackpool – the Fylde Coast is hardly a national treasure

    wwaswas
    Full Member

    zippykona
    Full Member

    OK we now have a new form of fuel to extract from our land.
    How about we sell it to a foreign country then buy it back for twice the price?
    Previously I’ve called Tony Blair a weapons grade ****.
    Mrs May …step forward you are an evil, weapons grade ****. **** you you stupid **** **** and those stupid **** retards you call your **** government.

    bigjim
    Full Member

    This government never cease to amaze

    Fracking will be more tightly controlled here than in the US but I still wouldn’t want to be living anywhere near it, the lorry traffic alone would be a nightmare.

    Harry_the_Spider
    Full Member

    They are indeed a pile of ****s, but with no credible opposition who will stop them?

    I live in the last rural community inside the M60. Consultation starts next week about building 1200 houses on Green Belt.

    binners
    Full Member

    but I still wouldn’t want to be living anywhere near it, the lorry traffic alone would be a nightmare

    One of the many objections of the local population, and their elected politicians who universally rejected the planning applications. But which have been just been loftily overruled from London

    Same old, same old….

    This is far from finished though. Local feeling was strong anyway. And that was before everyone had their apparently wrong democratic, and genuine concerns decision casually dismissed from our remote rulers in London

    Theres going to be all manner of shit kicks off when they actually try to physically start drilling on those sights. Obviously Theresa is happy with how the large-scale protests and the inevitable confrontations/violence/arrests are going to look on the news

    ninfan
    Free Member

    good hydrocarbon extraction:

    Bad hydrocarbon extraction:

    binners
    Full Member

    Oh **** off ninfan, you clown!

    That mining picture from the 70’s is a total misrepresentation. As you well know!

    Ii note that you, like the people who’ve just overruled local democracy, because we gave them the wrong answer, will be absolutely nowhere ****ing near where any of this is taking place. Its like bloody colonialism!

    Dick! 🙄

    EDIT: So you’ve edited your image. The comment still stands that thats an old technology being phased out. So you’re still a dick!

    ninfan
    Free Member

    Fine… I’ll give you a nicer picture of more recent coal mining (see edit above) happy now?

    I may be a dick – but you’re a hypocrite

    bikebouy
    Free Member

    km79 – Member
    RIPieces Lancashire.

    FIFY.

    However, sorry but I think it’s a good idea.

    binners
    Full Member

    *must… stop… feeding… the… troll*

    thisisnotaspoon
    Free Member

    good hydrocarbon extraction:

    Fossil fuel, not hydrocarbon

    [/pedant]

    phiiiiil
    Full Member

    It’s interesting looking at how planning applications for windfarms and those for fracking are dealt with; windfarms go through many hoops at different levels so they have a high change of being canned, fracking is handled centrally so it still goes ahead however many people object.

    It’s a good job there isn’t some kind of global agreement that maybe we ought to actually do something about climate change, otherwise the government would be seen as totally hypocritical. Phew!

    thisisnotaspoon
    Free Member

    It’s interesting looking at how planning applications for windfarms and those for fracking are dealt with; windfarms go through many hoops at different levels so they have a high change of being canned, fracking is handled centrally so it still goes ahead however many people object.

    No, both get objected to by NIMBY on parish councils, then maybe/maybe not on district councils, then get overruled by Westminster and given a go ahead.

    Or can you point me at a windfarm which was blocked by Wesminster?

    irc
    Full Member

    I take it all the objectors don’t have gas fired central heating? No hypocrites here. We need gas and the benefits outweigh the risks. Cheaper gas and security of supply. Bring it on.

    ransos
    Free Member

    Fine… I’ll give you a nicer picture of more recent coal mining (see edit above) happy now?

    Yes, because the choice is shale gas vs. coal.

    I take it all the objectors don’t have gas fired central heating? No hypocrites here. We need gas and the benefits outweigh the risks. Cheaper gas and security of supply. Bring it on.

    If I ever get stuck in a traffic jam does it mean I have no right to complain about building more roads?

    Harry_the_Spider
    Full Member

    Is Balcombe going to get it next?

    dragon
    Free Member

    Well its better than shipping it from Qatar or USA as we currently do. Also we already extract oil & gas from onshore sites like Wytch Farm, and Gatwick both of which are down south.

    binners
    Full Member

    No, both get objected to by NIMBY on parish councils, then maybe/maybe not on district councils, then get overruled by Westminster and given a go ahead.

    Have you ever actually been to Lancashire? Heres the view from my bedroom window….

    We’ve got wind turbines all over the place. hundreds of ’em! And while there are a few (mostly grumpy old) objectors to them, most people are happy to have them here. I love looking over to them slowly turning on the other side of the valley.

    Are you seriously suggesting that its just nimbyism to object to putting fracking wells in the middle of densely populated areas, given their track record in barely populated areas in the states, with regard to contaminating ground water, causing earth tremors etc? And that the environmental impact is just the same, and no riskier then some wind turbines?

    Seriously?

    phiiiiil
    Full Member

    Or can you point me at a windfarm which was blocked by Wesminster?

    My point was that there are no instances where a windfarm blocked at the local level was subsequently overturned at Westminster. Westminster shouldn’t need to interfere with either, so why are they doing so for fracking?

    irc, there’s no hypocrisy… I have gas heating, but our bill is so small we’ve had our bills messed up twice because the suppliers assumed the readings weren’t right. With such cheap gas home efficiency measures don’t really make financial sense, so there’s very little incentive to reduce our energy usage. New houses could have very low heating requirements, but currently developers are not required or incentivised to build or update houses as such. This will all come back to bite us when we *have* to reduce our gas usage, either because of rising prices or the dawning realisation that we need to take climate change seriously.

    munrobiker
    Free Member

    The process of fracking I have no real issue with, as a geologist I view it as being relatively safe.

    However, it’s 2016. We absolutely, definitely should not be burning any more things to produce energy. Why the money for fracking can’t be invested in renewable of nuclear is beyond me.

    GrahamS
    Full Member

    Theresa May on Sunday:

    the Government I lead will be driven not by the interests of a privileged few, but by the interests of ordinary, working-class families.

    Theresa May on Wednesday:

    Our democracy should work for everyone, but if you’ve been trying to say things need to change for years and your complaints fall on deaf ears, it doesn’t feel like it’s working for you.

    Theresa May’s Government on Thursday:

    Screw you, ordinary working class families, trying to block the interests of the privileged few with your democracy. Your complaints fall on deaf ears.

    Amazing stuff. 😆

    phiiiiil
    Full Member

    However, it’s 2016. We absolutely, definitely should not be burning any more things to produce energy. Why the money for fracking can’t be invested in renewable of nuclear is beyond me.

    Absolutely. With the Paris agreement it’s acknowledged that we must not burn the fossil resources we know about, let alone whatever else we find. So why are we even still looking?

    bikebouy
    Free Member

    We have fracking sites in the South Downs where I live.

    So it’s not just confined to the Northern Counties.

    Have concerns, water table/large fractures/contamination. But it’s nothing like the desolation caused by Coal Mines, and no one bothered moaning when they were in full swing, belching out stink across the UK. And I’m not trolling, Coal Mining made a lot of people both warm and comfortable, enabled them to earn a living on their doorstep and huge communities grew and prospered. The only difference I see with this is the NIMBY attitudes who fail to grasp the need for Gas. I guess you could turn it off for all those NIMBIYs who object to it, see how far consternation gets them..

    kimbers
    Full Member

    Why the money for fracking can’t be invested in renewable of nuclear is beyond me.

    well bell pottinger have been lobbying the tories, for some time on behalf Cuadrilla to get this (and hinkley) moving

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 110 total)

The topic ‘Fracking in Lancashire’ is closed to new replies.