Viewing 27 posts - 1 through 27 (of 27 total)
  • for trails and mtb, aluminium or steel?
  • PeaslakeDave
    Free Member

    what is better for trails and mtb riding, steel or aluminium frames?

    druidh
    Free Member

    Neither. It really has to be carbon or titanium.

    DaveVanderspek
    Free Member

    What do you mean “better”?

    MrNutt
    Free Member

    depends if you like it stiff or supple

    PeaslakeDave
    Free Member

    what do you prefer? how much more supple can one be compared to the other?

    jools182
    Free Member

    you’re more rad if you ride steel

    with rigid forks

    and no gears

    and rim brakes

    on the front wheel only

    Garry_Lager
    Full Member

    Aluminium, bro.

    Edric64
    Free Member

    953 steel custom built

    cullen-bay
    Free Member

    full suss- aluminium
    Racing- aluminium (if carbon/ titanium isnt an option)
    Fun riding – i would prefer a steel bike, aluminium is a bit harsh up here.

    MrNutt
    Free Member

    its a very noticeable difference, for example the orange p7 feels smooth but alive to ride where as the sub zero feels taught, solid and quick

    ahwiles
    Free Member

    i’ve got 5 bikes, 2 of them have aluminium frames, 3 are steel.

    i’m not sure it really matters all that much, all things considered, imho.

    both are better than carboard frames, they’re f**king rubbish, and that’s a fact.

    PeaslakeDave
    Free Member

    i havn’t really ridden a wide range of bikes, only my own.

    shindiggy
    Free Member

    Steal is Real

    Hairychested
    Free Member

    Nike or Adidas?

    cynic-al
    Free Member

    Op it’s subjective

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Don’t get too hung up on it. I do miss the rear end feel of my Soul when I’m on the Mmmbop but I like the lightness. Always said if Cy did an alu Soul I’d buy it, all that “steel is real” crap but it’s the handling I love not the material.

    There are stiff steel bikes and flexy alu bikes, I stupidly bought into the whole “alu is stiff” thing til I got my Scandal, I honestly reckon if you stuck Inbred stickers on it people would ride it and declare how lovely the steel ride is.

    sharki
    Free Member

    I’ve ridden a range of bikes, from carbon full sussers, aluminumuminnnum, FS and HT, Ti and steel.

    Can honestly say my personal fav is steel, very closely followed by Ti.

    The others were fine but me and steel just seem to get along well.

    Of course that’s my personal preference based on experience.

    You’ll find many if not all riders go through owning many bikes built of different materials, and drift from HT to FS or own both. And quite often along the way, they find something that suits them, a bike they can feel at one with, this can be as much material as it is geometry, set up and build.

    So what’s better for trail and mtb is the right one for you.
    Spend well, carefully and most all enjoy riding.

    I can jump on any bike now and just be happy to be able to ride free.

    cookeaa
    Full Member

    I’ve gone back to all aluminium MTBs recently. Having started hacking about the woods on cheap compact ali frames after riding a kona xc steel frame before that and then flipflopping between the two materials for the last decade I can conclisively say, either can be good or bad. Geometry makes a far bigger difference to how a bike actually handles. I will say this though, now the whole world has a hardon for steel you can find a few aluminium bargains I reckon.

    cookeaa
    Full Member

    ….

    GNARGNAR
    Free Member

    ookeaa Geometry makes a far bigger difference to how a bike actually handles.

    +1

    nickc
    Full Member

    I can’t believe people still worry about this stuff

    Coasting
    Free Member

    The ride is more influenced by the bikes build than the material.The handlebars,seatpost and tyres will be more noticeable than the steel or alunimium thing.Sure there are peps on this forum that will swear by one more than the other but thats more to do with image/fashion than fact

    MrNutt
    Free Member

    was the OP’s original question which frame material? not what tyres, bars or geometry, of course those factors all have influence, no one said otherwise. And to say that the both feel the same to ride is just ignorant, the same frame, built with the same components would demonstrate a marked difference both in weight, strength, stiffness and feel. no?

    br
    Free Member

    For FS – alloy seems the better material – cheap and light.

    For HT – alloy beats me up, steel is nice but heavy and the only carbon ones I’ve ridden were race bikes – so Ti for me.

    futonrivercrossing
    Free Member

    Your all wrong – it’s bamboo innit 🙂

    TandemJeremy
    Free Member

    MrNutt – Member

    was the OP’s original question which frame material? not what tyres, bars or geometry, of course those factors all have influence, no one said otherwise. And to say that the both feel the same to ride is just ignorant, the same frame, built with the same components would demonstrate a marked difference both in weight, strength, stiffness and feel. no?

    Depends on how it is built. Its perfectly possible to build a very harsh rigid steel frame and a very flexy aluminium frame.

    Its perfectly possible to build them both to the same weight. Infact you could proabably build two frames one light harsh steel one and one heavy flexy alloy one if you wanted.

    ahwiles
    Free Member

    b r – Member
    … steel is nice but heavy … so Ti for me

    i’m just imagining what kind of lovely, light, custom steel frame you could get for (half) the price of a Ti frame…

    custom curtis anyone?

Viewing 27 posts - 1 through 27 (of 27 total)

The topic ‘for trails and mtb, aluminium or steel?’ is closed to new replies.