• This topic has 4 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by GJP.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Flight comparison sites
  • Duane…
    Free Member

    Hi all,

    Starting to plan a trip to China this summer with the girlfriend, and potentially going to Malaysia after, and then home via Germany.

    Have looked on a couple sites (Kayak and skyscanner mainly), but I’ve noticed that they always find prices using just one company – i.e. if I need 5 separate flights, they will all be with the same airline.

    Are there any comparison sites that will add up all the cheapest flights from different airlines?

    Or does it just work out that it is actually always cheaper to use one airline for the whole trip – economies of scale and all that?

    Any tips of finding good prices for flights would be appreciated too 🙂

    Ta, Duane.

    youngrob
    Full Member

    I use skyscanner.

    CaptainFlashheart
    Free Member

    No idea re the price comparison sites, but for multi location trips, I’ve always found that the order of cheapness is;
    1 – all on same airline (as in, all planes from one airline)
    2 – all on same alliance (as in, all OneWorld or Star airlines)
    3 – Mix and match

    Options 1 and 2 also might make you look nicer prospects to the airlines for thos elusive upgrades!

    By way of exanple, I did a multi-city trip to Asia and the cheapest was all Cathay flights.

    China is a little harder, as it’s less well served by the sort of airlines that are pleasant, or at least bearable, to fly with!

    Have a great trip! Am jealous!

    Munqe-chick
    Free Member

    Although if you book through one airline they will help you ref connecting flights if one gets delayed. Skyscanner is good.

    GJP
    Free Member

    Generally for simple trips ABA, ABCBA type journeys with no open jaws then it will be cheaper to fly on one airline than a of mix carriers, and especially for ABA trips. This is is because two competing carriers fares will not generally combine, and thus either only a fully interline or IATA fare can be used to price the itinerary. IATA fares are industry fares set high and accepted by all carriers.

    For more complex trips including connections then it is not so clear cut. Airlines working together under anti trust and revenue or profit share agreements may follow the principle of metal neutral selling, and therefore the price will be the same whether it is the same carrier throughout the whole trip or a change of carrier. However, the availability of the seats may still give rise spot price differences either by routing or carrier.

    Outside of alliances then you are into the world of bilateral interline agreements and the special prorate agreements agreed between the carriers. More or less attractive agreements will be reflected in the validating ticketing carriers own pricing.

    The pricing of multi city trips is not going to be any easier, especially if you are travelling into obscure places where the carriers do not have interline e ticketing agreements with each other. For example, the big European flag carriers the many domestic airlines in china. This would mean not only would multiple carriers fares need to be used to price the trip but the itinerary would need to be ticketed on multiple carriers ticket stock.

    It seems likely to me that comparison sites do not handle these complex cases very well ( lean thinking around runners, repeaters and strangers may suggest why bother with the complexity)

    Sorry if all of that didn’t make any sense 😆

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

The topic ‘Flight comparison sites’ is closed to new replies.