Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
  • F1 – Overplayed race history and significance.
  • Mooly
    Free Member

    I have always liked f1 over the past 14 – 15 years and feel that at the moment it definitely is genuinely exciting.
    However, i do get a little pissed of when they go to a new circuit and play it up to be the most amazing track, steeped in the most history etc.
    Surely they need to give it a bit of a rest.

    Pook
    Full Member

    well yeah, but if you’re one about Monza or Spa, they’ve both got massive historical significance in F1 and motorsport as a whole

    br
    Free Member

    Haven’t watched for years, but flicked on this lunch-time an it was a joy to watch Surtees’s eyes twinkling as he sat in the current Ferrari.

    richmtb
    Full Member

    So when they go to Monza they should concentrate on the amazing track layout and exciting corners instead?

    uplink
    Free Member

    the current Monza layout (give or take) has been like that for a good while

    it’s a wonderful place that really pushes cars to the limits

    aP
    Free Member

    Well its the last year you’ll have to put up with this kind of thing so you’d better make sure you complain about absolutely everything until the end of the season.

    Mooly
    Free Member

    I admit that I`m not totally in touch with all the specific details of each track but when they are at Monaco, Silverstone, nNrburgring anon its always the same.

    Mooly
    Free Member

    aP – will do.

    uplink
    Free Member

    We’ve still got Sao Paulo and Suzuka after Monza too – let’s enjoy the good stuff while we can eh?

    donsimon
    Free Member

    It’s just history innit? It’s not like it’s important like, is it? I mean WTF? 🙄

    Pook
    Full Member

    Yeah, Monaco, Silverstone and the Nurburgring being completely devoid of any historical significance too eh?

    🙄

    donsimon
    Free Member

    You’ll be telling me next that Hill was a great driver too, no? Looks a right gimp with the grey goatee too.

    Mooly
    Free Member

    Not at all. All great but no matter what race there at it always seems to be made out to be the most important of the season. Maybe the history angle was wrong.
    For what its worth i think the last few seasons will certainly go down in history as a some of the most interesting and open.

    uplink
    Free Member

    I’d soak it up mooly

    the calendar is getting steadily raped
    although it looks like they’ve may have tipped a hat to traditional circuits again in the last year or two let’s hope they keep it up

    richmtb
    Full Member

    Monza is a bit of an odd one though, if you were to list the truly great circuits in F1 you couldn’t honestly include Monza.

    But its still considered one of the blue ribbon events of an F1 season, a lot of it is down to Ferrari and the devotion shown by the fans, a lot of it is also down to the historical aspects associated with the track. I also think that these days it offers a pretty unique layout given that half the circuits in F1 now were designed by the same man, cheifly it seem to accomodate hotels

    donsimon
    Free Member

    For what its worth i think the last few seasons will certainly go down in history as a some of the most interesting and open.

    But seriously, the level of interest is more down to the technology and rules, and less down to the drivers.
    The tracks have changed to make them safer too and more competitive.
    Historically there were more battles between drivers Schumacher/Hill, Senna…. Well anyone. Personalities James Hunt with his fags, booze and chicksters. Politics and tactics Peterson and Andretti. Drama. Etc, etc…

    uplink
    Free Member

    the level of interest is more down to the technology and rules and less down to the drivers

    sort of agree but for the more serious fans the dynamic between drivers is significant
    eg alonso/hamilton schumacher/barichello and the more recent ones we’ve seen at spa etc. That’s the sort of stuff that adds an edge and uncertainty

    donsimon
    Free Member

    Isn’t that more to do with the press offices and team politics than the drivers on the track though? My point being that historically the drivers were the sport and now the technology and marketing is the sport. Neither is wrong, just one wouldn’t exist without the other therefore the history is actually important.

    uplink
    Free Member

    I dunno, some of it is very real

    I do love the history of it though

    richmtb
    Full Member

    Technology and regulations have dramatically improved reliabilty which means more racing. Technology has also meant closer racing.

    I think the competition between the current drivers is as good as its ever been.

    FeeFoo
    Free Member

    The ardent footy fans at my work have started to watch and talk about F1, so it is obviously getting more exciting and better coverage.

    Ironically, they are the ones with Sky Sports who will continue to enjoy it next year, whereas I won’t.

    the-muffin-man
    Full Member

    Silverstone has loads of history, but its an awful, boring, cold, souless place made even worse by the new ‘improvements’.

    aP
    Free Member

    Best turn the telly off now mooly – they’re doing it again …

    totalshell
    Full Member

    silverstone has nothing.. its an airfield in the middle of no where the wind blows and the rain falls.. you might have still been in short pants when there was an enournous row as upstart silverstoine ‘stole’ the GP from brands hatch. the sooner it gets back to aintree the better..

    uplink
    Free Member

    Silverstone held the gp long before Brands Hatch and was in the mix from the early 50s so it certainly has the history
    it used to alternate with Brands Hatch but I don’t think Brands ever had it exclusively

    the old Silverstone (pre 90s) was a fearsome place – on a bike anyway – and was one of the biggest challenges for rider/driver of the season

Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

The topic ‘F1 – Overplayed race history and significance.’ is closed to new replies.