‘Gonna take a while to get used to them’ – for anyone interested in the sport they’ve been around for 3 months already! I’m mostly liking the new look – think last year’s cars look a bit daft in comparison now.
Stoner – this is about one of the best explanations I’ve read. Basically it’s a loophole where the design of the rear crash structure can be combined with the diffuser – the diffuser is primarily governed by rules on parts as seen from below the car, so the extra bit between diffuser and crash structure is excluded from those limits & the limits on the crash structure are much more open.
Coffeking – if you don’t think they look that different, can you spot the difference between these two ;-)?
Toyota’s diffuser makes a very interesting interpretation of the revised 2009 rules (and one that has already prompted speculation regarding its legality). By exploiting regulations that allow extra bodywork within a 150mm zone in the centre of the car, the team appear to have cleverly shaped the TF109’s rear crash structure (upper red arrow) so that it effectively lengthens and heightens the diffuser’s central section, which also features a very low splitter at its base (lower red arrows).
McLaren’s
McLaren, Ferrari, Renault and BMW Sauber have all made very literal interpretations of the revised 2009 rules regarding the rear diffuser. All of the channels are the same height and length, with no difference in height between the main central section and the side channels. This contrasts with the designs of Toyota and Williams (see subsequent illustrations), which interpret the new regulations slightly differently.
thepurist – 🙂 I can see the differences, they just are not big enough to shout about and say “god these look aweful and last year they were so much better looking”.
On the BBC F1 website, you can watch clips and extended highlights from classic races. ATM, they’ve got the 1986 and 1994 Australian GPs, the whole extended highlights programmes! I was watching last night; fantastic.
The ’86 race is inertesting, as there is quite a variation in the designs of the cars, from team to team. Today’s F1 cars do look a whole lot more homogenised. If you took all the stickers off, and sprayed them white, ittud be hard to tell them apart.
I’ve didn’t have the sound up but it looks to me from that video like the cars can change tyres while they’re still moving, can do 360 spins and not lose position and have had some bits changed, is that about right?
I have a piece of work to do at the Williams Centre near Didcot, next week. The place is amazing, underneath is possibly petrol head heaven. Just about one of all the F1 cars Williams ever made from the early F1, ground effect, 6 wheelers right through to the present. Awesome….
Nah, they (83-88 at least) just had turbos the size of dustbin lids, boosting at up to 6 bar of pressure, into tiny little 1.5 litre engines, forcing up to 1500bhp out of them in qualifying!
Yes the Williams Conference Centre is quite impressive. As well as the cars the museum contains displays with the mechanicals like the brake systems, hydraulic systems etc. I’ve been a couple of times the last time being for a team building event where one of the activities was acting as pit crew to change the wheels on Juan Pablo Montoya’s 2002 car- we managed 9.5 secs for all four wheels which I thought was pretty good for complete beginners
Now come on, wake up and smell the coffee… F1 has gone ‘GREEN’ … that front wing collects all the litter that would normally desicrate the countryside for eons….
You can bet your life some team will put the brushes on the back, be 0.5sec a lap quicker and all the other teams will throw their dummies out of their prams..