Yep – it was always promoted (to the council and landowners) as a race. Have a look at the position in England and you’ll find that racing on bridleways is illegal (as is, of course riding at all on footpaths).
The landowners I spoke to don’t have a major issue with cyclists (not as much as the runners do – I’m not sure I understand why) but they were concerned about aspects such as public liability should they “give permission” for an event on their land. This was exacerbated by the notion that the tracks would also be open to all the usual walkers, cyclists, pram, dogs, horses etc.
It’s a shame. The Pentlands tracks have rarely been in better condition (remember last “summer”?) and some forward thinking might have produced a workable closed circuit. The fact that the organisers decided to publicise the event despite not having permission does make me wonder if they were trying to exert a bit of pressure. Maybe it can all be sorted out for next year instead of being rushed through.
Comparisons with other events like the SSDT are going to be difficult as I’m not sure any of these take place in an area which already has such a high concentration of leisure users.