Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Dual control – rapid rise or normal mech?
  • woodrz
    Free Member

    Hi all – not been here for a while, but am in the unenviable position of having to replace some gear shifters. What is the current view on Shimano Dual control shifters, in particular regarding the choice of rapid-rise or top-normal rear mechs. Looking at the documentation, the gear shift with top-normal looks more logical to me (press down for lower gears, flick the auxilliary lever for higher), but I’ve seen a review elsewhere that says they work beter with Top-normals.

    Thanks in advance….

    Mister-P
    Free Member

    Shimano intended dual control to be used with low-normal (rapid rise) and when I have ridden DC it has always made sense with that mech. However many people use top-normal and I know Specialized spec’ed their dual control bikes this way.

    DezB
    Free Member

    Low-normal for me.

    woodrz
    Free Member

    Ah – didn’t know that about Spesh – they don;t normslly do daft things!

    Thanks!

    Stoner
    Free Member

    when I ran DC I preferred low-normal, but horse and courses I guess.

    crazy-legs
    Full Member

    I can’t stand Rapid Rise, both my MTBs have Dual Control with top-normal mechs, works for me. 🙂

    Swiftacular
    Free Member

    Rapid Rise is supposed to prolong drivetrain lifetime also. O always used rapid rise with DC, and found it very intuitive, even swapping in quick succession between triggers and DC, it just seems the right way for it to work when you’re using it.

    DezB
    Free Member

    it just seems the right way for it to work when you’re using it.

    That’s cos it is. Thumb lever to shift down – just like Rapidfire.

    Nobby
    Full Member

    Definitely prefer rapid rise with my DC’s.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

The topic ‘Dual control – rapid rise or normal mech?’ is closed to new replies.