Viewing 22 posts - 41 through 62 (of 62 total)
  • DSLRs – Do I sell all my Canon gear and buy a Lumix GH2 (for bike shooting)
  • 5thElefant
    Free Member

    They are the only people to use 2 AF sensors I think it is.

    That’s their last generation stuff. It gave live-view AF, but no video. The new stuff is SLT based and does video too (but has a EVF not OVF).

    molgrips
    Free Member

    SLT, that the semi transparent mirror?

    AlexSimon
    Full Member

    Yes, “single-lens translucent” (bit dodgily worded isn’t it)

    AlexSimon
    Full Member

    Any more thoughts today anyone?
    At the moment I’m leaning towards going for it (with the GH2 and kit lens).
    I went into local Wildings this morning and didn’t really like the handling of the camera, but I can see that it’s small enough to go in my camelbak (especially with the pancake lens). And the size and weight will help massively when it comes to any cablecam or jib rigs I make.

    SebRogers
    Free Member

    You’re not bothered about losing the extra reach of your Sigma 70-300? Because you’d need to add an extra lens to the GH2 setup to replicate what you already have, which narrows the price difference between that and upgrading to a 60D body. I know what I’d do 🙂

    5thElefant
    Free Member

    I know what I’d do

    Get the Panasonic 45-200 as well? Sounds like a plan.

    You won’t miss the extra length for video though. The clever cropping digital zoom takes care of that.

    AlexSimon
    Full Member

    I probably need to do some more experimentation with long lenses, but so far I’ve used the 70-300 very very little.

    For a start it’s not that great a lens, then there’s the narrow aperture – most of my photography involves being wide open.

    I looked at the stats on Lightroom and apparently of my 9415 clicks with the 40D, I’ve only kept 35 taken with the 70-300. I’ve just looked through them and I can’t say I’d upload any of them to flickr or put them in the family album except 2 of the Gormley statues on Crosby beach. http://www.flickr.com/photos/tryingtimes/sets/72157600337567537/

    Clearly I’m not being creative enough, but it goes to show that I wont really miss that lens currently.

    AlexSimon
    Full Member

    Oh – Seb – thanks for jumping in – only just saw your username!
    Have you had a go with the GHx? Dabbled in video?

    molgrips
    Free Member

    Long zoom is only really useful for wildlife or paparazzi isn’t it? Or sports I suppose.

    Birds and animals are pretty much the only time mine comes out, and really the reason I bought one after seeing tons of cool critters in Estes Park in Colorado (including a bear 🙂 ) and coming away with a load of tiny teeny pics.

    AlexSimon
    Full Member

    Hmmm – just found this other 70-300 shot which must have been before I switched to Lightroom.

    Camouflage by tryingtimes, on Flickr

    molgrips
    Free Member

    I like that. Good use of zoom imo. Not just framing something a long way off but picking out details from something closer.

    b17
    Free Member

    Nice Alex.

    A big advantage of zoom/tele is separating backgrounds nicely (and compressing perspective).

    Seb could say it nicer himself, but if you browse the photos on his blog (which is good btw) notice how many are done with the 200mm f2. So include bike/sports photos in your need for the telezoom.

    Tele is also nice if you want to get nice shots of field sports, as you can shoot from the end of pitch rather than the side. Got some nice pics at my rugby club recently with my 120-400 (/dreams of 400mm 2.8…..//).

    grum
    Free Member

    There are no fast tele options available for m4/3 at the moment, unless you are happy manually focussing.

    b17
    Free Member

    even at f5.6 tele separates backgrounds better than wide-standard.

    To be honest, I don’t personally think that the small mirrorless cameras (or even very small SLR bodies) suit tele lenses well. With increasing focal length I’ve been glad of increasing body size (plus grip) for stability/balance/handling.

    AlexSimon
    Full Member

    Manual focus for film is okish, for stills of mountain bikers – erm… I guess I’d have to learn new techniques – prefocussing for example.

    Telephoto is great for compressing perspective – it’s probably why most amateur mountain bike shots always look less dramatic than it was in the flesh.
    I have actually been meaning to try telephoto on steep stuff, but I only really have my LX3 with me on rides (which maxes out at 60mm 🙁 )

    b17
    Free Member

    some compacts seem to do ok at the tele end. I’ve been thinking about an Olympus mu tough for biking duties, which goes to about 120 or 140 (off the top of my head). Depth-of-field/background separation is always going to be a bit naff with a compact sized sensor though.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    I’d say for MTBing you need the lens that gives you the shot from the limited vantage points you have. For example if you are on a steep hillside you have to be near the trail and riders, so wide angle.. but if you have to be on the other side of a ravine or something..

    My fave from Seb’s site is the really wide one of the Lakes hillside with the bikers in it. The texture of the hill really reminds me of being out there and scanning the views myself..

    SebRogers
    Free Member

    Hi Alex 🙂

    I’ve dabbled in video, but only with ‘proper’ video cameras. I’m not especially convinced by the dSLR + video thing, though I think you can make a case that it makes more sense without the mirror thing getting in the way. But still… a stills camera with HD video built in is, at best, a big compromise on the video side (downsampling, dreadful video ergonomics, usually poor audio, etc. etc.). Most of the excitement around it is because limited depth of field with video used to be insanely expensive… and now it isn’t. But like all ‘looks’, it’ll wear thin over time. There’s more to good video than incredibly narrow dof in every shot.

    If you’re happy with the Canon for stills but fancy dabbling in video I think you should approach it from that angle, personally, rather than throw the baby out with the bath water. So to speak 😉

    _tom_
    Free Member

    The last episode of House Season 6 was shot entirely on the 5DMKII and looks incredible 🙂

    AlexSimon
    Full Member

    Cheers Seb – I must admit, I find myself clicking on vimeo videos which have the most bokeh in the thumbnail! 🙂
    I can’t see myself in a financial position any time soon to be able to buy one of those Voigtländer f/0.95 lenses though 🙁

    I’ll sleep on it another night – this afternoon was spent photographing my Canon gear ready for putting on sale though!

    5thElefant
    Free Member

    I can’t see myself in a financial position any time soon to be able to buy one of those Voigtländer f/0.95 lenses though

    25mm f1.4 c-mount are £17. Have a look on youtube. Plenty of examples.

    AlexSimon
    Full Member

    Thanks 5th – that looks like a great way to have a play!

Viewing 22 posts - 41 through 62 (of 62 total)

The topic ‘DSLRs – Do I sell all my Canon gear and buy a Lumix GH2 (for bike shooting)’ is closed to new replies.