I don’t think you have understood the question
Actually I think Emsz understood the question perfectly, has had a think about things, and posted a very reasonable response imo.
But as for the ‘right’ to drive a car; if this were so, then surely the Yerpean Commission for Human Rights would be insisting everyone had access to a car.
To me, ‘Rights’ are stuff like access to clean water, enough to eat, adequate safe warm housing, clothes, education and healthcare. The ability to gain self-respect and be valued for your efforts in society.
And to have access to that in society which anyone should be able to enjoy. Ergo, if an able bodied person can enjoy certain things, then it is the duty of society to ensure that those less able should equally be able to enjoy such things, as much as is possible.
A farmer needs to be able to get their produce to market, ultimately for all our benefit potentially, so maybe they have more ‘rights’ to motorised transportation than others, in our modern world. We would consider a patient with cancer the right to be able to have access to treatment that involved the very best in medical technology, woon’t we?