TurnerGuy – Member
Please note Turner Guy that the demonstrator said that its much easier to convince people of the effect if there is a visual element
this is my problem with surround sound at home – the visual clues you get from a small screen in front are too divorced from the attempt to create sound all around you.
I have a Yamaha A/V amp, which is 5.1, and has a whole bunch of DSP profiles for (supposedly) reproducing the authentic acoustic for various halls, clubs, stadia, etc, and I never use any when listening to music, I switch the effects off, except if I’m playing a 5.1 remastered DVD-A or SACD, and even then I don’t add any sound processing, it just sounds false.
I’m not a fan of trying to recreate a ‘live’ acoustic or soundstage in a home environment anyway; in most live situations the sound is crap unless you’re going to stand at the back, because there’s no focus for the singer at the front centre, although I have been to a couple of concerts where a couple of foldback monitors in the centre have been turned to face the audience, allowing people at the front centre to actually hear what the singer is singing. This is so rare, though, and unnecessarily so, and it makes a huge difference.
Whenever I read about someone trying to recreate the live experience in home audio, I honestly think, ‘you really don’t get out much, do you’; and if they have been to the occasional live concert, it clearly hasn’t been somewhere like The Scala, in London.
I’d be fascinated to hear this whizzy new speaker playing a variety of music which I’m familiar with, but im not going to travel miles to do so.