Peterfile, I believe his use of the word moral was entirely correct. Morals are your own, mine are different from his and both are different from yours. He thinks it is the moral decision, he did not say it is the ethical decision.
Not sure I want to get into a debate about the meaning of morality on a saturday night 🙂 But, my understanding is that morality is concerned with whether actions are right or wrong.
You say morals are personal, so why did Dawkins offer his moral to another as being the only and correct one? He offered it because he does not feel that it is a subjective topic, he thinks he has the correct answer. For such a subjective topic, there is no right or wrong answer IMO and therefore to come down on either side does not lead to either party being moral or immoral.
btw, I sympathise with Dawkin’s position, I just don’t agree that “immoral” was the correct word to use.
The dictionary says it means “not conforming to accepted standards of morality”
If morals are subjective as you describe, how can there also be accepted standards?