Kryton, I’ve got a large one of these: http://www.cannondale.com/gbr/2013/bikes/mountain/hardtail-29er/f-series-29er/f29-1 (click on the geometry table – Effective TT 24.5 inches, actual is 23.5)
For reference:
I’m 5ft 10.5 in bare feet. That’s an actual height on measured on proper NHS calibrated kit – for what it’s worth, most people (including myself) overestimate their height by an inch or so (Source: we were working and training with this kit on an MRC project)
According to the Competitive Cyclist web fit thing I should be on a bike with a 24″ ETT.
I agnonised between the large and the medium for a while. It seemed as though I was a bit ‘in between’ sizes. On the Medium I had a lot of seat out the frame, and although it was a 29er it felt very ‘flighty’ (sort of perched feeling) and I felt a little cramped and too upright.
I went for the large in the end – I’m right at the bottom of the height range for that size frame I imagine – still got a decent amount of post and ok standover, but I feel nicely balanced ‘between the wheels’ (much more so than on the medium, and any other bike I’ve ridden for that matter). In addition, mine came with a long 115mm stem, and I’ve not felt any need to change it – contra to what everyone else is doing!
I would guess the Large would be right for you, unless you like it be dead upright etc.