Go to bespoked 🙂
Allow plenty of time. Talk to everyone. Take a camera and get pics of things you like. Look closely for detail stuff as there are some really tidy little ideas hidden in there.
Also try and talk to Keith on the Reynolds stand – they should be able to advise on a tube set for a particular application.
The fatigue test loads are set around a heavy rider, so something that passes might be overbuilt for a rider of your weight.
But the stiffness you want from a frame also plays a part in the choice of tube sizes etc. Fancy materials (853 etc) don’t make it stiffer but allow a tube of reduced wall thickness so you can have a bigger diameter (stiffer) tube with no weight penalty.
There has been talk of some subsidised fatigue tests – more to validate the quality of particular builder’s construction methods (so using a tubeset and fork length that “should” pass the test if built properly).
In reality, the only really scary fatigue failure would be fracture of the head / down tube junction or fracture of a rigid fork. So think about the design in that area. Maybe choose someone that has made lots of forks, or a production fork that has been tested.
The only fillet brazed head tube detachment I’ve seen was a very short 29er one, where there was overlap of the top and down tubes. It appeared to have been brazed in one go (rather than brazing the “whole” tube on first, then adding the overlapping one). So it left a portion in the middle that was not brazed at all and hence acted as crack initiation point hidden inside the joint. The rider ended up with major face damage and was in ICU for a bit…. So think about top and down tubes with a bit of daylight between them where they join the HT 🙂 I work in a fatigue lab (not bike related) and often the devil is in the detail.
18 bikes used to have some fatigue test info on their site. And I seem to remember Cotic wrote a few good discussion articles.