Mainly due poor design giving high stress concentrations at windows but all the same there was several instantly lost at altitude over oceans
Almost correct…IIRC the design was just fine, but in construction they opted for squared off instrumentation windows instead of the rounded edge windows on top of the fuselage that were specified. Compromises were made with the riveting and materials used too.
But I’m being a pedant here. The point is that the performance of early jet airliners taught us a great deal about the fatigue strength of aluminium and the necessary manufacturing processes. By the time Concorde prototypes flew (just twenty years after the Comet’s first flight) we’d pretty much got it right. The only other non-aluminium fast jets of the era that I can think of are the SR-71 which was constructed from titanium as a necessity to deal with high temperatures and the Soviet MiG 25, which was constructed mainly from steel for similar reasons.