Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Camelbak or water bottles?
  • hanchurch
    Free Member

    What do you do, weigh down the bike or yourself?

    Jeffus
    Free Member

    Camelback my last few bikes have not had bottle mounts so no choice.

    edlong
    Free Member

    Camelbak – you end up eating less dog shit that way.

    thegreatape
    Free Member

    I ditched my wee rucksack for a water bottle and an Alpkit Fuel Tank (Fuel Cell?) with a few tools in it. I find that much more comfortable, but no room for a jacket (but I’m usually quite near home) or food (but I have extensive natural energy reserves).

    rob2
    Free Member

    Use a bottle mostly as I prefer the weight of my back. On long rides use a camelback lr thingy with the reservoir in the wing bits so it’s nice an low

    fasthaggis
    Full Member

    Both

    njee20
    Free Member

    Bottles.

    teasel
    Free Member

    Both but not at the same time. After a recent Swinley ride I’ve realised I drink far less than I used to when unfit for some reason so probably going to switch to just bottles.

    TheSanityAssassin
    Full Member

    Bottles only.

    vincienup
    Free Member

    Bag, but no bottle mount options on my frame.

    Don’t really like bottles though even on frames that can take them.

    rp16v
    Free Member

    roadbike – bottles
    hardtail – bottle or camelback
    full sus – camelback for all dayers – bottles if racing laps

    I have q/r bottle mounts on my bikes so can swap them around really easy if my mood changes.

    hanchurch
    Free Member

    Never used a camelback but it makes sense to put 2.5kg on me rather than the bike.

    samuri
    Free Member

    Only ever bottles for me. I found the weight of the camelbak with water in gave me serious back problems. I still use the bak to carry stuff about when I’m mountain biking.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)

The topic ‘Camelbak or water bottles?’ is closed to new replies.