well hels - i wasnt asking for the data - i was asking for the correct proceedure for my partner to ask for the data from their company. when they told me the above.
If we are in tyhe wrong after seeing the CCTV then fair enough BUT hels - the reason im fighting this is that i do not believe the damage to our car could have been caused by hitting a stationary car unless we were sliding sideways. my front wheel is folded in at the rear and the tire burst - it has bent my wishbones and a bolt on part of the chassis INWARD - to the centre line of the vehicle - which given the 4x4 nature of the vehicle are bloody big girders it has bent my wing inwards at the rear - but hasnt touched the front of my lower wing. the upper wing and indicator are dented by the bus due to the height/colour of the damage but the bumper has no damage from the corsa.
the other small car has damage along the whole front of its car - mostly on the front drivers corner but all the way along the front to the passengers side bumper
the laws of physics say we were hit by a moving car to cause that damage. yet she claims she neither dropped folk off nor was she moving - she was merely traveling along the road and wanted to overtake the bus.
fingers crossed for the CCTV - TBH i think we might get 50:50 at best but the folding like a wet newspaper on the basis of lies has got me riled.