What happened, one of theirs Bombed London first and it was an accident by an off course Bomber ditching its load, Churchill (possibly seized upon the incident)retaliated by Bombing Berlin and in a way sacrificed London precisely to save the fighter command airports that were getting hammered.
That was the one.
So Churchill used civilians to protect the military in a way that you would expect of HAMAS not a western leader, right?
We don't really have a right to complain about "atrocities" committed by the Germans against us during the war because there were very few. Whilst German, a country in which the majority of the population never voted for the Nazi party during their rise to power suffered millions dead. Someone will probably mention that they got what the deserved due to the holocaust but I'm not so certain they did deserve this, the German people that is. The Wehrmacht, the Luftwaffe and the Navy were never really that keen on the Nazi party and individual accounts show that they were often horrified and contemptuous of the SS - it's certainly not a cut and dry issue. In any case I prefer to think of the Germans an people as victims of the Nazi party.
Some posters on here really need to STFU considering our involvement in hilarious genocidal escapades such as Ireland, the Indian Mutiny of 1857, the 'accidental' deaths of Boers in internment camps during the Boer war, the Mau Mau uprising and our all round general imperialism that revolved around annexing countries smaller than us.
Oh but you're a dirty liberal if you think the morality of a war is only that which is decided by the victors - when Britain kills foreigners it's because we were showing those dirty savage jungle bunnies how to live properly and educating them, when Germany does the same it's because they're evil.
We have the same bias today with terrorism. According to the west "People like Saddam and bin Laden hate us for our freedom while we love freedom". The US/UK's close alliance with Saudi Arabia as well as their support of Colombian death squads demonstrates this love of freedom.
Mass slaughter and destruction are OK when we do it because we are spreading democracy and freedom such as protecting the Iranian people from themselves by overthrowing democratically elected Iranian Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh in 1953. When they do it, its because they are spreading fear and hatred. Another difference between "I Can't Believe It's Not Terrorism" and Terrorism is that we have God on our side and they don't. Whether an act of violence is terrorism or "I Can't Believe It's Not Terrorism" also depends on who perpetrates it. If the act is committed by leftist guerrillas in Colombia, socialists or communists in Latin America, Islamic extremists, Basque separatists, or Palestinian militants it is terrorism. If it is committed by American Backed Banana Republics including Colombia, the United Kingdom or Israel, then it is "I Can't Believe It's Not Terrorism".
I **** hate people.