Bike trends you'd like to see the back of

Bike Forum

Bike trends you'd like to see the back of

149 posts & 80 voices | Started 9 months ago by Herman Shake | Latest reply from PJM1974

Tags:

No tags yet.

Pages: « Previous 1…345 Next »

julianwilson - Member

Ah, bottle bosses.... My SC bullit has them, but with little plastic 'bolts' presumably for weight saving? On a 9lb frame?

I've started using cages and bottles sometimes (short-ish rides) for simple washing-up laziness, I'd rather wash 15 bottles than give my camelbak bladder a scrub, it's a right faff.

I think it's about time we had a new bottle boss standard. Like old bottle bosses, but further apart for at least 66.67% increase in cage stiffness. Perhaps with internal hydration tube routing so you can lean into your slammed stem (oooh, we haven't had a new standard for that for a while either have we?) and have a slurp of the latest energy/isotonic wunda-drink from it.

Posted 9 months ago #
TheArtistFormerlyKnownAsSTR - Member

Right, just to question some earlier posts.

Dropper posts I think are generally disregarded by people who've never really tried one. Mine works perfectly well and I wouldn't be without it.

Downtube cable routing - my bike takes some knocks, but I can't say any of the three braided hoses/outers that run under my BB have ever shown any sign of damage.

Carbon frames - can't see the problem. These days they are as strong as Alu, yet lighter (and blingier )

Triple chainsets on 6" AM bikes? Why not - I use the highest and lowest gear on mine, ergo what's the problem? Tried 2 x 9 and it was crap.

Lock on grips are a no-brainer - and if anyone moans about them weighing a couple of grams more, I might go and kill myself.

I'm sure there will be some black anodising somewhere on my bike too - why not?

Mavic rims - they have served me well for 15 years and I won't be changing any time soon - tried some expensive Rovals and they were made of cheese - didn't last 2 months.

I'll check back and scan through for any more nonsense posted in a minute

My bugbears? Hmmm, struggling - however other peoples riding habits, now there's another thread completely....

Posted 9 months ago #
ivantate - Member

and dropper posts that will fail.

Great idea until they let you down.

Posted 9 months ago #
ivantate - Member

no pun intended

Posted 9 months ago #
perthmtb - Member

Hmmm, not convinced that being able to remove and re-fit BB cups easily is that important. How often do you really do that? Only time I take mine out is to throw them away. Now, needing a new tool to do it I agree is a pain - but that's not unique to press fit. Over the years I've used cotterpins, square, hollowtech 1, hollowtech 2, and now pressfit - and every one has needed a new tool!

Posted 9 months ago #
nmdbase - Member

Nukeproof Mega

Posted 9 months ago #
Terry Wrist - Member

Agree with the tour shirts, stuff like this should be banned

Posted 9 months ago #
scotsman - Member

Over biked? What a load of bollox! FFS ride what you want!

Posted 9 months ago #
beanieripper - Member

I'de like to see the back of generic, cheaply made products that fail which are just rebranded and painted pink or white or anodised the colour of sick to get people to buy them when there are better but less flash components out there..

Posted 9 months ago #
fivelittlefish - Member

ivantate - Member

-prententialism on the trail

You made that word up! Do you mean "pretentiousness" ?

Posted 9 months ago #
teadrinker - Member

Suspension.

Posted 9 months ago #
mrbump - Member

I'd like to see the back of all snobbery in the MTB world such as the people who go on forums just to tell other people they don't they are idiots and that their own knowledge is far superior.

Posted 9 months ago #
fivelittlefish - Member

oh the irony...

Posted 9 months ago #
flashes - Member

People who are obviously slower overtaking and stopping in front of me at the 2 sets of lights I do stop at on my inward bound commute.

Posted 9 months ago #
Jezkidd - Member

Hammerschmit - a solution without a problem

Posted 9 months ago #
honourablegeorge - Member

Hammerschmidt at half the price would have been a massive success. It made a lot of sense.

Well, maybe half the price and two thirds of the weight.

Posted 9 months ago #
singlespeeddan - Member

I don't wear team kit but don't have a problem with it. Someone wearing a full euskatel team kit is no diffferent than going to a match with a replic ashirt on or turning up to a five a side game in full (Insert your favoutite team here) strip.

What get's my goat is ever increasing price rises in return for kit which will not last any longer than what went previously. I am not prepared to pay for 10 speed kit when nine speed seems to be a good compromise between longevity and price. Particularly with regards to road kit.

also do you need such low gears on your bike. How a bout you just harden the f"£$ up.

Caveat: I have been consuming beverages of an alcoholic nature so excuse me if tis makes no sense.

Posted 9 months ago #
Simon_Semtex - Member

Most things made by Crank Brothers. Pedals and seat-posts seem to be made out of cheese.

Companies that present themselves as ethically driven but sell out to large multi-nationals. (Howies)

Companies that leave product testing up to their paying customers. (Microsoft)

Women only riding groups/skill sessions. (Why can't we just all ride together.)

Posted 9 months ago #
whinosp - Member

I never understood the reason for Hammershmidt gearing to be so low. Marketed for free ride bikes that seem to be pushed up hills rather than ridden in the granny, surely the Hammerschmidt gearing would have made more sense to be equivalent to a middle/big ring rather than a granny/middle? Might have then been more useful on freeride/DH bikes?

Posted 9 months ago #
PJM1974 - Member

The Hammerschmidt was a great concept, but was let down on three fronts:

1) Gearing, the high ratio was subject to noticeable friction, unlike the low ratio. Duh...as was said before, it would have made far more sense if it would have been a 34/36T equivalent with a step down to 22T where the frictional losses could have been easily hidden.

2) It was far too heavy...

3) It was far, far too expensive.

Posted 9 months ago #
Jezkidd - Member

What I've never understood about hammerschit is why is it any better then a front mech. I've always thought that it's heavier, got more parts, more friction (probably marginal), coats more and does the same job. Happy to have my assumptions answered though

Posted 9 months ago #
PJM1974 - Member

I think that's a pretty accurate assumption. The other selling point was that the Hammerschmidt system was much lower in profile and therefore less prone to chainring damage.

Oh, and because of this, suspension designs which worked around a 32T pivot placement didn't work properly either. The Marin Attack Trail frames necessitated a reprofiled suspension link in order to avoid excessive chain feedback.

Posted 9 months ago #
Northwind - Member

D0NK - Member

15mm dropouts? Well the fox/shimano one is quite good, better than QR, quicker to use than 20mm and presumably lighter

Surprisingly enough, a QR15 axle is heavier than 20mm Maxle Lite (in fact it was heavier than the last version of maxle lite, the new one's lighter still) . And not faster than a 20mm maxle.

The only place you can find an advantage are in the hubs- with a smaller axle you can either build a smaller hub with the same size of ballbearings, for ligthness, or a same-sized hub with larger ballbearings, for reliability. But in practice most wheel manufacturers went with convertible hubs anyway so the advantage got wasted.

It's a joke standard. But seems to have won the fight It'd be less annoying if Fox hadn't had a 20mm standard as well.

Posted 9 months ago #
Skyline-GTR - Member

29er's although it seems the industry is more than embracing this "fad" and seems to be making it the new mountain bike.

Mountainbikes are 26" wheeled bikes, and will continue to be so despite this blip on the MTB history radar.

Posted 9 months ago #
cynic-al - Member

Skyline WTF is your problem?

Posted 9 months ago #
cynic-al - Member

Luddite? Moi? Mais non. I just like reliable stuff that works that isn't going to have me in tears when it breaks. I still happily run UN73 BBs as they last for years. Put simply, they just work and keep working. As for £700 odd for an Enve rim? Fools and their money is indeed the phrase that springs to mind. If you have the money, by all means spend it and be happy with your purchase. It's just not going to make that much of a difference at the end of the day. There's no number on the front of my bike when I ride so the perceived performance benefits from carbon are negligible.
As for Stan's, having seen two almost brand new rims bent or buckled beyond repair this week, I can fully understand why my local wheel builder doesn't stock them and refers to them as Stan So Flats. Ha! Ha! Personally, I prefer to buy rims that are in true when they come from the manufacturer. Mavic rims may not be on trend but rims like the Open Pro CD work and work well
.

Yup enve rims are stupid...I was thinking well priced rims that offer real weight savings at a reasonable price eg Planet X carbons.

As for your stans rims "evidence", do you really think someone totalling a new rim makes it poor quality? Or that a whole 2 rims is a statistically relevant number? What about my 2 6 year old 355gm rims still running fine?
I thought you were intelligent and worked with numbers?

Posted 9 months ago #
monkeyboyjc - Member

URT frames - i cant beleive that they still make these (even if it is on silly cheap bikes, its like there was a surplus of rear triangles made in the mid 90's)...
Coloured componenets - just because its something i'd not have on my own bike/s, i've not seen a bike that looks 'better' because of them imo.

Posted 9 months ago #
zippykona - Member

Baggies when it's warm.
No one wears a t shirt then puts an expensive, non breathable plastic coat over the top .

Posted 9 months ago #
The Southern Yeti - Member

"the Rules"
Mincing
People who worry about tyre choice... ffs just ride them, they'll be alright.

Posted 9 months ago #
Spin - Member

The notion that you can't do certain things with / without certain kit. ("You wont do that on your hard tail" / "You need 7" for that"). Skill up!

Posted 9 months ago #
Edric 64 - Member

Lycra worn on the outside when off roading.

Why ? I usually wear lycra kit its so much more comfortable than baggy shorts flapping around

Posted 9 months ago #
Spin - Member

And whilst I'm at it lets be honest about the baggies thing. They are a pure fashion / appearance thing and add nothing to performance.

Put your hand up if you have ever caught lycra shorts on on your saddle on a tricky bit of trail?

I rest my case.

BTW I wear baggies. If you'd seen me in lycra you'd thank me.

Posted 9 months ago #
zippykona - Member

Here here.

Posted 9 months ago #
Euro - Member

I'd like to see the end of 'skills' courses.

Mental skill set my arse!

Posted 9 months ago #
Waderider - Member

I hate fashion over function. To me riser bars are the best example, although there are others. The hands can be put in the same position with less material using a different stem and an appropriately designed flat bar.

People driving to trail centres without exploring their local trails or getting a map out bugs me. They're missing something, losing out.

Posted 9 months ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Pages: « Previous 1…345 Next »

Reply »

You must log in to post.

Singletrack Mountain Bike Magazine

Bike Forum

Bike trends you'd like to see the back of

Reply »

Don't miss…

Singletrack

Website & Forums

Exits