not that I could have afforded to pay for my education back then.
Yet you still remain educated at public expense.
Oh well, you seem happy to stick up for a wealthy socialist
So Socialists aren't allowed to be 'wealthy' then? Even if they've worked hard all their lives, and their endeavours have benefited many others in society?
that Daily Mail article you linked to made him sound even more of an ar5e than I thought he was
Personally I thought that article made the Daily Mail look even more like a hysterical reactionary right-wing rag than I thought it was.
Actually, no it didn't. I always knew the Daily Mail was a hysterical reactionary right-wing rag. Which is why I don't take it seriously as a newspaper, unlike some people.
Reality is someone could benefit if he decided to move out of his house.
But he'd then still need a home.