The bit about the defence team snooping on the victims fb accounts to demonstrate that they are still able to live normal lives really grates on me
As if that should make any difference
If they’ve given evidence in court that is contradicted by their social media postings then I absolutely think that’s fair enough, personally.
No different from the travel firms busting fake tummy bug claims based on social media, or fraudulent benefit claimants getting busted working as scaffolders when they claim they can’t walk ten metres.
When it works well, our justice system can be pretty good. Everyone being equal in the eyes of the law is key to it. If that means scumbags have the same rights as angelic grannies, then that’s fine with me.
The IQ thing was a stretch, but somewhere along the scale the issue of culpability and responsibility arises when someone has a cognitive impairment. Again, I wouldn’t want our system to disallow such evidence, although I’m pleased that in this case it hasn’t led to what most would consider a correct verdict not being reached.