I heard this headline on the radio this morning
My immediate -prejudiced- thoughts were:
-More children and more of them playing out on the streets in less-well-off areas.
-The better-off kids may have more 'comfortable' lives, travelling everywhere by car and sitting in the house on electronic games
———————————————————————
To contribute to the wider debate, we're probably better off than a lot of people, but live in a 'poor area' (albeit in a reasonably nice road) and will be moving house as soon as possible. The amount of litter and general untidiness is very unpleasant, a lot of the locals are rough and I wouldn't willingly send my kids to the local schools.
Yes, people like me contribute to the ghetto-isation of an area, but I'd rather that my family lived somewhere nice if possible
My grandparents all grew up in inner-city slum housing that has since been demoolised, but weren't thick, had a bit of pride in themselves and my family are now not paupers.
A lot of people have been helped out out of squlaor in recent years. It is complex and some people have problems that are difficult to rectify, but the phrase,
"You can take a horse to water, but you can't make it drink" comes to mind when it comes to helping some of the 'less-advantaged'.