Speaking as a non electronics geek, I have always found sharp stuff at bit rubbish in the same way as Bush stuff is.
that is a bit of an insult – Bush have rarely made anything of any quality whereas Sharp have a long history of quality electronic goods.
Sharp seem to produce more sets in the budget range now than they did so they should be judged accordingly.
However I have recently seen quite a few Sharp LCDs that I have been quite impressed with.
My parents-in-law have one and it makes a much better job of displaying SD freeview channels than a similar Panasonic that we were using in a rental cottage the week before, which was fed from Freesat.
I visited someone recently with a large Sharp set showing BBC iPlayer HD material and I was very impressed with the picture quality.
I used to have a Sharp Aquos ‘Optimised-for-Pal’ set that had 540 vertical pixels.
When displaying PAL it chopped the top and bottom 18 lines from the picture and mapped it straight to the display – so there was none of the nasty effects from upscaling that you see on many sets.
For broadcast HD, 1080i mapped straight onto the screen as each frame is 540 lines and so again no upscaling needed, and 720P could just be downscaled slightly.
The results were excellent, combined with a very good color representation.
When I replaced it with a Sony LCD it took me a long while to get ‘as good’ a picture with broadcast sources – I have to make adjustments in the Sony’s service menu to get the colors better, and I had to use the upscaling in my Virgin V+ box rather than the TV. The difference on a 720P source was pretty much unnoticable, and the Sharp scored on its better colors.
When looking for a new set Sharp would figure in my shortlist, along with Panasonic, and Sony as I think their new sets seem to have good pictures.
LG and Samsung would not – dubious about LG’s quality (why has their name got Lucky in it?) and I think Samsungs picture processing sucks badly.
[My first job was at BBC Research Department when they were working on HD, which was 1280 lines of analogue and very impressive, so all my judgements on picture quality stem from this – I have yet to see anything that was as good as back then]