Partner has a Rock Lobster SL (Easton Ultralight) and I've got a Rock Lobster 853 (Reynolds Steel). Similar specs, although mine has slightly heavier wheels, and hers has slightly heavier forks. Mine also has an oversize bar and stem.
After 3 years of swapping between bikes, I've come to the following conclusions:
1. The alloy bike is a nicer colour.
2. The alloy bike is about a pound lighter, therefore easier to lift over gates.
3. The alloy bike feels like it accelerates much quicker, although I have no way of verifying this.
4. The steel bike is comfier over long distances, has a 'softer'feel to it, and seems to 'pinball' slightly through rock gardens rather than smack on through regardless. Tend to feel less 'beat up' at the end of the day when riding the steel bike.
This may all be a load of old toss, but that's how it feels to me.
5. The biggest difference we've made to either bike is to fit Thomson seat posts to both bikes.
This has resulted in a much stiffer ride on both bikes, but the alloy one still feels harsher.
However, the steel one with the Thomson feels harsher than the alloy one with an Easton EA50 post did.
6. Tyre pressures make much more of a difference than you think.
7. I used to be a steel frame snob and wouldn't consider riding anything else. This is no longer the case, and if (when?) I need to buy another frame, I won't be so dogmatic.
And before anyone starts, we didn't buy 'matching' bikes deliberately. 😀
The alloy one was a cancelled order on display at Merlin at a masive discount (£850, Hope bits, XT,- those were the days eh?) when I went to order my bike. Being a steel snob at the time, I didn't buy it, but Sue, being a sensible woman snapped it up. Bargain.