So, I’ll try to be brief. Bought a second hand hammerhead 130x frame, paint was a bit scruffy. Thought I’d have it professionally dipped to take it back to a nice smooth matt alu finish.
Found a professional place recommended so dropped off the frame a month ago.
Thy were closed for a bit over Christmas so kept in contact with the guy there. Paint wasn’t shifting. Toughest paint ever seen.
They got most paint off then sent it off to a sister factory to remove the last bit. Other factory had some less corrosive acid so to reduce any risk of damage to the metal. They seem like a really good company so no pitchforks yet.
Heard from them yesterday…finally ready after a month! But they said, metal shows some light pitting as if it’s been shot blasted. I think it could have been when hammerhead rebranded the Thumper they factory stripped them and repainted with new decals before sale. The guys reckon a filler primer was used hence such a bitch to remove.
Skip to collection today. All wrapped in plastic so could only see some light pitting. Not great I thought. Going to need a powder coat. On closer inspection it looks a bit balls’d!
So the question to the STW hive mind is what the ****? Is it structurally knackered and whom should I aim a pitchfork for? Could long exposure to the formic acid have exaggerated previous pitting damage?
It looks like it was dipped in caustic – which certainly softens paint but eats aluminium too.
Drop some aluminium foil in washing soda & see what happens.
It will also be like that inside the tubes as well. Deffo scrap.
No way would I ever acid strip a frame. Dichloromethane / methylenechloride (what used to make nitromors work before it went ‘green’) would be the eyeball melting product of choice I’d want using if I was paying someone to strip a frame for me
my thought was caustic had been used – the opposite of acid, but actually, more effective at removing paint so I wouldn’t be surprised it was used. Was the process described as chemical dipping and you assumed acid, or was it described as acid stripping? That would affect the validity of any claim.
Also, if it was caustic used, the guys should have known this was a no-no for an aluminium frame, but maybe they didn’t know and thought it was steel?
also in case there was any doubt, it’s only fit for the bin. The inside of the tubes is likely to be even worse since the digestion there would have started immediately (these areas not being protected by paint initially the way the outside was) so front triangle gubbed too I would say
I wouldn’t acid dip a frame personally as I’ve had bead blasting done to great effect before on some suspension forks which would have got the finish you wanted.
Problem is this sort of company probably don’t deal with delicate aluminium bike frames and might not know that major damage can occur from even slight defects. That’s the risk you take though, using harsh industrial processes to treat delicate bikes. Personally I don’t think you have any claim against them, maybe a chat with them might stop it happening with someone else though?
No worries Chapaking…pretty evident now I’m on the lookout for a full frame. Appreciate the STW community has a diverse financial range but mega pissed off as this was from whole family birthday and Christmas presents for last year. It meant a lot to me. Better start saving!
Just in case anyone was loosing sleep over this one. The MD of the company agreed that it had been left in the chemical bath too long and they had knackered my frame. They kindly offered me some compensation and my replacement frame is due this week. Happy days.