Alternatives to 2.35 LUSH High Roller?

Home Forum Bike Forum Alternatives to 2.35 LUSH High Roller?

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Alternatives to 2.35 LUSH High Roller?
  • Premier Icon Leku
    Subscriber

    Need to replace my rear tyre which is currently a 2.35 LUSH High Roller. Anything else worth a look? But it easy to run tubeless.

    Live in Bristol so use natural trails when it’s dry and trail centres when it’s wet. Stans Crest run tubeless.

    Tom_W1987
    Member

    2.3 Highroller 2?

    Or you could try keeping a high roller up front and go with something faster rolling if you’re a decent rider and don’t mind the back end squirming a bit.

    timc
    Member

    currently running 2.4 HR2’s front & rear & looking to replace the rear for something lighterweight / rolling, thinking a 2.25 Ardent/Advantage, Not sure a 2.3 HR2 or 2.3 Minion DHR2 would change much…

    experiences of others?

    reggiegasket
    Member

    Ardent LUST is a good rear. Rolls well. Just about tough enough, maybe not on a HT on rocky terrain.

    Premier Icon Leku
    Subscriber

    It’s for a fs. Shame is that they don’t do an Advantage 2.25 LUSH.

    Have tried Fat Alberts, Rubber Queens, & Smorgasborgs. Used HR as easiest for tubeless.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

The topic ‘Alternatives to 2.35 LUSH High Roller?’ is closed to new replies.

Comments are closed, but trackbacks are open.

Skip to top