I currently have a SLR camera body Minolta 404si and use a Sigma Aspherical IF lens also if I was to sell the Minolta body how much will I get for it, (re-post, just looked on eBay B I N £10 🙁
I’m wanting to replace the body of the camera to a DSLR verson but want to keep the lens I currently have, I love taking pics and think I have an eye for it, (pic below on a standard Cannon IXUS 75 & Bear Grylls eat your heat out!!!)
but my current Cannon is rubbish with the zoom, all blurred etc so with a better lens and also a MUST image stabiliser!!!, I hope this will be better.
So the question is which DSLR body, O and budget upto £150 very MAX.
An alternative is to ditch the Body and lens and go for a Panasonic Lumix FZ50 Single lens superzoom compact.
10 mp
35-420 fast lens with non-rotating filter mount, manual zoom ring and manual focus ring. The lens doesn’t ‘grow’ during zooming (can be important).
The lens is designed by Leica and is stunning quality.
Check out some tests, see how it compares.
Has Optical stabilisation.
Get one from ebay for around your budget.
I would probably do the job, but the lenses aren’t changeable and you’ll be wanting to upgrade again pretty quickly!
I’d say as Tijuana Taxi says above, buy Sony, get a modern kit lens to go with the one you have now and get taking photos with a camera that can be expanded upon as you go along.
Camera bodies are pretty worthless after a few years but the investment in good lenses is never going to let you down, I’m an Olympus user all of my lenses have been bought secondhand and if I sold them I would recoup the costs I made in buying them in the first place.
Not that good, camera is only 3mp and to be honest the lens ain’t that great either, sold one I bought in a job lot for 45 quid, what Canon lens is it?
Still think you could do better unless you are paying about a 100 or so quid for the lot, no image stabilisation either which you listed as a must have
8MP surely? Same as my EOS 20d that I think is fine colour rerpoduction on the 20d was far superior to my previos 10d. Don’t get sucked into the higher number of MPs the better the camera.
Also had a Tamron 28-300mm lens, while not the quality of my current L lenses, it would produce reasonable and reasonably sharp pictures. But the cost was significantly less than an L lens to.
As TT says, cost should be a factor. The 30d should be a nice robust camera that’ll give you a good start in the world of Dslr cameras.
this is the message from the sellor – Yes the camera and lens will work together. Being an aftermarket lens it does suffer from error 84 once in a while. This is a known issue where non Canon lenses sometimes have comms issues with the camera. It seems to happen roughly once every 30 shots and just needs the camera switched off and back on again to cure.
Happy to do both together as a buy it now, feel free to make a sensible offer.
If it is really 3.3MP, I’d leave it. Equally if error 84 keeps popping up. My Tamron worked fine on my 10d without ever showing an error.
I’d say it’s a) a bit of a risk due to the error 84 and b) a bit crap with only 3.3MP, but it is within you budget and you’re not going to get much at that price or lose that much if it goes the shape of a pear.
I saw a second hand 20d body in Chester a couple of weeks ago for about 200GBP put that with a 50mm lens 80GBP and you have a nice robust starter kit, IMO.
I’d throw this in the mix, you will need an adapter for the lens you have but it shouldn’t cost much. This body has stabilisation built in. It is significantly smaller and lighter. It will only be beaten in IQ marginally by those older DSLRs mentioned on this thread – if at all. Probably indistinguishable in good shooting conditions.