I’m not sure how you can categorically deny the existence of something without having complete confidence
What you do is look for evidence of god that is repeatable and verifiable for say two millenia fail to find it for god. You then look at the evidence that refutes it and then way it up
Anything else isn’t really very scientific
Laughs. I assume you are agnostic on psychic powers, homoeopathy, herbs curing cancer etc then as anything else would be unscientific ?
The evidence of science [ the data] on these issues does not say we dont know it says there is no evidence to support the view that their is a god, homoeopathy works etc. No faith is required to reach this view.
Thanks. I’m an engineer. I make decisions based on numerical information and probability on a daily basis. For the record I think the existence of God is highly highly unlikely. In practical terms you could say I don’t believe in God. But science doesn’t talk in absolutes, rather balance of probability. To make the statement “God doesn’t exist” is unscientific. To simply not believe in something requires faith.
All this arguing is making my crystals glow a funny colour. I nominate going off topic on a thread.