It was always about common sense discretion that was taken away from head teachers.
If your kid is attaining above the required levels, and the time off doesn’t bring their school attendance below 95% in a rolling 12 months, let them take it.
If they are not attaining (and don’t have special needs to justify that), or attendance will drop below 95%, then the fine should be double the cost of the **** holiday.
If my absence from work dips below 8 days/3 incidents in a rolling 12 months, I face a disciplinary review, don’t see why parents and kids shouldn’t be facing the same real life pressure.
And that’s speaking as a parent who has not had a term time holiday for 8 years, and kids attendance never below 98%.
No one has a “right” to a cheap holiday. You only have a right to time off work. Though I accept that people who do not control when their leave is rostered should get special consideration from the schools.