Thanks Mr Icke

Hugely informative

Personally I dont trust the govt or conspiracist nut jobs but walk the middle line of healthy scepticism armed only with the ability to follow an argument /evidence

With that I’m off to check my crystal balls

what me, damm perverts (they are everywhere so the internet told me)

so, the emergency services are completing a drill based on intelligence that if an attack happened, then the attack happened like the intelligence predicted?

Doesn’t that mean we have good intelligence in this country?

Here’s an unusual concept – take your tin foil hat off and have some respect, for the victims and for their families.

This.

Part of me wants to bite and say go on then, give us your theory, but I can’t get past the fact (in my opinion, of course), that I think the victims families have had enough to cope with without all the crackpot conspiracy theories. I suppose 911 was a set up as well?

Ok I gave in and took one for the team
1.you get a blurry CCTV photo with some claims – bit like the moon pictures they seem credible but it is actually bobins

then

A claim they did not travel on the 7:40 train
The evidence it was cancelled. The same evidence that they use gives the 7:30 train departure as 7:42 [ with the actual 7:40 train cancelled]…..no way could anyone think they were on a 7:40 train eh The next question shows proof the the Home secretary lied ]by saying they caught the earlier train ….well they sort of did yet they sort of caught the 7:40 one so its not surprising there is confusion.
Will it get better…on the edge of my seat…i am sure we all are

Apparently no one saw one of the bombers on the tube train he blew up so…they dont actually say what this means- is it that the eyewitnesses are dead? I dont think this is th einference they woud like us to make but they give no hint as to what this might mean

Apparently the bombs were military grade and the expert they cited [ using their link] said

The other link is them saying some more stuff so proper peer review stuff- i did not read it tbh

Again I am not sure how they sourced the materials is relevant or what the site claims it means as they dont actually say.

Then we are told someone [ private company] was running a drill that day where they imagined that terrorist would blow up trains [ I know huge leap not like the IRA did this } and the chances of him not being connected are 1 million to one…no working or evidence was shown for this probability.
it simply states

Again I am not sure WTF this is proof of tbh or why he should be interviewed- it makes no claim that they responded to the actual event

apparently three of them were really shot dead at canary Wharf

oh and wikki gives the doctor thus – an expert in his field but it has nothign to do with this – I know surprising eh

In a moment of absurd surrealism and tbh this is my favourite so far they cite MOSSAD as proof as they said they were warned before hand. Now if there is one secret intelligence agency who you should choose to believe i am sure we will agree its MOSAD- they of course gave no actual proof of the claim- to be clear they never proved mosad said this never mind mosad proved it was true

Where’s Kaesae when you need him?

Occam’s Razor – is it more likely that there was a massive government conspiracy which worked perfectly and still hasn’t been leaked or uncovered, or that a few deluded men did it on their own?

And what’s the motive?

Probably taking his medication again.

It’sssss a consssspiracy!

Why this is a non sequitor
Someone was doing some drills and there was an attack. I fail to see how this coincidence implies state collusion. TBH I fail to see why, if you were doing a terrorist attack, you would want a mock up there or what difference it would make to anything- have you any link that they responded to anything? Really wah tis the releavance and what does it prove? Two events that you have decided to connect and then blame “hidden state agents”[ you have not proved these] and reach a non sequitor.

I mentioned them above – most of them – like that one you mention – even if true dont actually prove a conspiracy that how weak it is is

y truth you mean support the conspiracy – you have decided whether you are a battery or a “red pill” taker

One wonders why they bother to point out it is some Muslims rather than Muslims – like with the recent murder of the squaddie- and do much to reduce tensions and direct confrontation if this is their plan…is this just to confuse .

Done with thi sthose argument are at best tenous and you dont really care fr facts or rational arguments so it is pointless to “debate”

Yours Battery official line following sheep etc

Once a Conspiracy is declared there is no possible way to get rid of it, they exist for ever, the more denials or evidence against it only reinforces the belief that the conspiracy is bigger, bolder an more terrible than first thought.

Just try convincing people the cream eggs don’t get smaller it’s their hands getting bigger.