Viewing 40 posts - 81 through 120 (of 214 total)
  • 62 points and still on the road
  • poly
    Free Member

    Aracer, your mum was prosecuted for s144 (keeping a vehicle without insurance) not s143 (driving without insurance). No points for the former. for your information, there is no lower limit on fines although for obvious reasons they rarely go below the fixed penalty.

    Larry_Lamb
    Free Member

    sockpuppet – Member

    Please stop doing that too

    Bet you’re one of those who I regularly follow, think doing 25 in a 20 is abiding by the law. Oh Mr holier than thou.

    Spin
    Free Member

    “There are so many cameras that if you have to drive 50,000+ miles a year you are almost bound to get more than 12 points in three years.”

    Only if you speed you idiot.

    wilburt
    Free Member

    Is this another one of those threads where bad drivers bang on endlessly about how hard done by they are and speeding/being a **** is ok if youre them?

    If so I’m out.

    tpbiker
    Free Member

    “There are so many cameras that if you have to drive 50,000+ miles a year you are almost bound to get more than 12 points in three years.”

    Not really, I’ve driven well over 150000 miles in my 24 years on the road and never had any points.

    Whilst spped is undoubtable a factor in accidents, so is poor attention to your environment. I’m more concerned not that the chap speeds constantly, but that he is so unaware of his surroundings he hasn’t noticed hes constantly getting caught

    MoreCashThanDash
    Full Member

    If I cannot drive I cannot work. I therefore do not speed even on the tedious 30mph country lanes that I would really like to blast down.
    Just like not using your phone when driving or paying attention to the road it really isn’t something that is hard to do

    +1

    It’s not rocket science. First time you get 12 points = 1 month ban. No exceptions. Your employer has to keep your job for you. With no car you may find it hard to get to work. You may have to take leave. Maybe unpaid leave. Your employer will be inconvenienced as well. They will probably try and impress on you the importance of not losing your license again. Your family may well be inconvenienced. Tarquin may miss rugby training and Jemima may miss riding lessons. Granny may have to find someone else to get her shopping and take her to the hospital. Your family may try and impress on you the importance of not losing your license again.

    2nd time to 12 points. Another month ban. Without the employment guarantee. You cockwomble.

    aracer
    Free Member

    Fairy nuff – I must have got confused then, because I could have sworn the FPN mentioned points. Maybe she was caught driving then, but it came indirectly? I’ll have to find the letter I sent and see if there are any more details in it…

    edit: ah found a bit of correspondence I had with a chap who’s occasionally on here who’s a barrister – he suggested it was probably a DVLA camera which clocked her driving, so I was probably wrong in my previous post and it she was caught driving

    ratherbeintobago
    Full Member

    It’ll be some cardiac surgeon or something

    If I lost my license, I’d have to get to and from work on public transport (which is one of my colleagues who chooses not to drive any more does) and stay resident on call, instead of doing it from home. Can’t see why the knife monkeys surgeons would be different.

    Didn’t the sainted Guy Martin have some silly number of points?

    captainsasquatch
    Free Member

    Didn’t the sainted Guy Martin have some silly number of points?

    How, how dare you, how dare, how, how dare you, how the actual dare you bring St Guy into this debate? HOW DARE YOU? 👿

    teasel
    Free Member

    “There are so many cameras that if you have to drive 50,000+ miles a year you are almost bound to get more than 12 points in three years.”

    Yet another in disagreement of that statement (though I can’t seem to find who wrote the original). I used to do about 75,000 to 100,000 miles a year for 13 years and in that time I managed to get 3 points for an anger induced heavy-footed blast over in EC2.

    Don’t drive angry, kids…!

    captainsasquatch
    Free Member

    How dare you?!

    teasel
    Free Member

    I’ll add that as a form of penance or perhaps to assuage a modicum of guilt I didn’t drive for about a decade once I’d quit that job.

    scaredypants
    Full Member

    First time you get 12 points = 1 month ban. No exceptions. Your employer has to keep your job for you. With no car you may find it hard to get to work. You may have to take leave. Maybe unpaid leave. Your employer will be inconvenienced as well. They will probably try and impress on you the importance of not losing your license again. Your family may well be inconvenienced. Tarquin may miss rugby training and Jemima may miss riding lessons. Granny may have to find someone else to get her shopping and take her to the hospital. Your family may try and impress on you the importance of not losing your license again.

    2nd time to 12 points. Another month ban. Without the employment guarantee.
    Splendid !
    *applauds*

    you missed 3rd time, though – d’you know what it is yet ?? (/rolf)

    tinybits
    Free Member

    As always, this is about to become a driving saint vs’s the world type thread.
    However, as an average driver, I can say sometimes I go over the limit. Normally I don’t. I drive 25k miles per year, I’d guess I drive past thousands of fixed cameras in that time and I see probably 2 mobile cameras a month on top. I’ve currently got 3 (plus £100) points for driving like a bellend on the way home from work one day. In the past, I guess I’ve driven somewhere close to 750k miles and I’ve had 9 points in total
    What I really, really don’t get is how the bloody hell can someone clock up that number f points and actually still be considered safe enough to drive – I mean purely from the observational skills alone surely there’s got to be a time you simply say I’m sorry – you’re a freaking liability. Throw your licence away forever.

    teasel
    Free Member

    a driving saint

    Just in case that’s aimed at my comment above, it wasn’t that I didn’t speed, it’s simply that I wasn’t clocked for doing so. Which is pretty good going all considered. All these years later I do drive within the limits because I generally don’t need to be anywhere within a set time window.

    If the remark wasn’t aimed at me, just move along.

    Edit : I’m not Moore or Ogilvy

    nealglover
    Free Member

    “There are so many cameras that if you have to drive 50,000+ miles a year you are almost bound to get more than 12 points in three years.”

    As someone who drives 75,000+ miles each year, and have done for many years, I can safely say, that this is bollx.
    It’s just another excuse (some) people use for speeding.

    MoreCashThanDash
    Full Member

    you missed 3rd time, though – d’you know what it is yet ?

    I think it involves a 6 month ban and I don’t care if you lose your job, your home, your wife and kids and your granny.

    Russell96
    Full Member

    Lie about your medical history that would preclude you from driving, get a job involving driving, kill 6 people, get away with it apart from having your driving licence taken away and continue driving anyway.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-39006862

    crazy-legs
    Full Member

    There are too many drivers out there who think they’re safe because they don’t speed. We’ve all seen them, those ones who stand the car on its nose as they enter a 30 zone, who sit there at 38 in a 40.

    But the problem is that they proceed at that speed no matter what. Overtaking a cyclist with a 1mph speed differential and a .75m gap but refusing to budge over or either wait behind or pull out, floor it and get the overtake done.

    Speed cameras are an easy fix for catching speeders but the only thing that can catch all the other numerous forms of dangerous driving is actual road policing and sadly there’s not enough of that these days.

    That’s why I’m astonished that anyone could actually accrue that many points to start with, their driving must be catastrophically bad to be caught that many times!

    DickBarton
    Full Member

    I read this today and remembered a video of some famous motorbiker who had a serious number of points on the licence…can’t recall the number but it was a lot.
    It does make you wonder how so many can be racked up and still be able to drive…

    jambourgie
    Free Member

    Well if they’ve got enough money to pay the fines, and they know that the magistrates will always be sympathetic due to their job. After about 16 points they’re just gonna go ape aren’t they? I mean, why not. What have they got to lose? I would (obviously apply common sense. No speeding in school playgrounds etc).

    They’ve basically got a get out of jail free card. It’s probably an in-joke and annual amusing anecdote with the family at Christmas about how many points they’ve racked up this year. They probably have little games and rules like ‘never dip below 90mph’ or ‘navigate central London whilst watching a DVD in the back of the car’.

    sockpuppet
    Full Member

    Bet you’re one of those who I regularly follow, think doing 25 in a 20 is abiding by the law. Oh Mr holier than thou

    Feel free to make any assumptions you like about my driving, in the absence of any actual evidence. All I asked was for a couple of people who by their own admission habitually and deliberately break the rules to stop it.

    Just like I think people-who-ride-bikes should obey the rules.

    In my experience it’s those who push the boundaries on one rule do so on many, so habitual disregard for speed limits goes with phone use, green/amber/red confusion/optimism, close passes etc.

    Expect everyone to follow *all* the rules, and make it the norm, and roads will be better, for everyone. Set an example with your own behaviour, hope it helps others do similar.

    Or, you know, accept the victim-blaming woeful attitudes that seem more and more common if you want. I’ll not be doing that.

    Oh, and btw, by ‘regularly follow’ I expect you meant ‘get left behind by’ didn’t you?

    sockpuppet
    Full Member

    On reflection, I will bite at ‘Mr Holier than thou’

    My driving isn’t perfect. I make errors. I admit my errors, review and do my best to change my behaviour where it needs it.

    But I try really hard to do it well. I strive to pay attention, drive at a suitable speed for the conditions or a lower speed than that if (as often the case) the posted limit is less. Irrespective of my opinion of that limit.

    I try to drive well. It’s often tedious. Others who would rather I went as fast as they would like, or that I squeezed past someone on a bike before it’s safe so they can do so to, seem to find it so.

    It’s hard, and I often take a handful of extra minutes to get somewhere. Then again it often makes no difference at all to my journey times.

    But at least I try.

    Driving is the thing I do that puts me at greatest risk of totally ruining someone else’s life, or killing a stranger.

    Nothing else I do carries more risk to me or to others than driving, so yes I try to do it well and safely. I think others should take it seriously too, and quit the childishness and selfishness. So yes, holier than thou, with that attitude to routinely and deliberately doing whatever you please without honestly acknowledging the death, chaos and carnage that can be a split second away.

    I make mistakes, but at least I try.

    You should too.

    pondo
    Full Member

    ^^^ Like

    funkmasterp
    Full Member

    Thank you Sockpuppet. Unfortunately you’ll probably be lambasted for your sensible approach to driving. It still amazes me that people (on a cycling forum of all places) think that speeding isn’t a factor in accidents. that it’s perfectly fine to speed and that it’s the cameras that are wrong.

    squirrelking
    Free Member

    A factor. Not the only one though and very much dependent upon conditions. Inappropriate speed needn’t involve speeding.

    teasel
    Free Member

    crazy-legs » We’ve all seen them, those ones who stand the car on its nose as they enter a 30 zone, who sit there at 38 in a 40.

    The first example is a bit annoying but shouldn’t be an issue if you leave plenty of space and ease off your speed so you roll through the limit sign at the designated speed. The second – I see no problem. In fact, that’s probably me. I do about 38 in a 40 because it’s within the limit. My dash is telling me 39. My dashcam will tell me it’s 40 and that stupid central speedo (MINI) tells me it’s quicker still.

    funkmasterp
    Full Member

    Speed is not the only factor, but one that can make an accident much more severe. Not paying attention in itself is dangerous and only made worse the faster you are traveling. I’ll agree that driving extremely slowly is also dangerous. I got slightly obsessed with the part speeding plays in fatalities after I lost my brother. It’s a very large factor in a lot of road deaths, especially deaths of those on foot.

    What’s wrong with traveling at 38 in a 40? It’s a limit, not a target. If it’s wet, raining, icy, foggy or there are other adverse conditions then I’ll travel below the limit.

    zanelad
    Free Member

    There is no excuse for speeding nor any need. Plan your journeys better or don’t travel.
    If you selfish idiots had ever been present to participate in the aftermath of a speed related road accident, I think you would take the wake up call.

    Sometimes speed is the only reason for the journey. I’m not going anywhere specific, just out for a blast. If you think I’m going to stop just because of your views you need a wake up call.

    If you think that everyone involved in a speed related accident never speeds again I think you’re deluded.

    Spin
    Free Member

    Yet another in disagreement of that statement (though I can’t seem to find who wrote the original).

    It was from one of the drivers interviewed in the BBC article which is why I used quotation marks rather than the forum quote option.

    The lesson from drink driving is that if we really want to change driving behaviour laws aren’t quite enough. The particular behaviour needs to be stigmatized. We’re getting there with mobile phone use whilst driving but less so with speeding. Maybe because unlike the others the consequences are less immediately obvious and it is possible to do it accidentally.

    In the perhaps not too distant future driverless cars might render this debate obsolete.

    scaredypants
    Full Member

    Sometimes speed is the only reason for the journey. I’m not going anywhere specific, just out for a blast. If you think I’m going to stop just because of your views you need a wake up call.

    I imagine that somebody has already said it on this thread; sadly there are cocks in every walk of life

    also, as is often suggested on the many “sportive” threads – do a proper race, or shut the **** up

    funkmasterp
    Full Member

    Sometimes speed is the only reason for the journey. I’m not going anywhere specific, just out for a blast. If you think I’m going to stop just because of your views you need a wake up call.

    Is that a quote from the Paul Walker poster on your bedroom wall? I’m going to go ahead and assume it is because you’re clearly twelve.

    teasel
    Free Member

    It was from one of the drivers interviewed in the BBC article which is why I used quotation marks rather than the forum quote option.

    Gotcha.

    Had a quick discussion with my partner on this subject (the 62 points person not this thread) and her idea was to stick them in those Google cars (or similar) as test dummies, taking the control from their hands completely. And if they go wrong and implode killing the occupant, no great loss… 😉

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    Well said sockpuppet.

    Driving is the most dangerous thing I do – for others as well as me. I have to drive to earn my living. I like to drive as it gets me and my family nice places on holidays and days off.

    Therefore, with so much for me to lose, I treat it with the care and respect it requires.

    tthew
    Full Member

    Sometimes speed is the only reason for the journey. I’m not going anywhere specific, just out for a blast. If you think I’m going to stop just because of your views you need a wake up call.

    If that’s not just massive trolling, then your licence should be revoked for life. Driving a car isn’t a human right, it’s a regulated, (by testing and licening) activity, and that attitude suggests your standards fall well short of the mark.

    funkmasterp
    Full Member

    Driving is the most dangerous thing I do – for others as well as me. I have to drive to earn my living. I like to drive as it gets me and my family nice places on holidays and days off.

    Therefore, with so much for me to lose, I treat it with the care and respect it requires.

    Both you and Sockpuppet have hit the nail on the head. Thank you both for treating driving with the respect and caution it deserves If only there were more people that shared your views.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    Was that renewal of an existing policy from one insurer, or consecutive policies provided by two different insurers?

    It was through a broker and 20 years ago, I’ve honestly no idea now. It’s not exactly what happened TBH, see below, it was just quicker to type.

    and you were unlucky enough to get pulled over during those 20 minutes? what are the chances of that?

    I’d just bought a new (to me) car, literally just picked it up from the garage. I’d got about two blocks down the road, a copper did a random PNC check and it came up as unregistered, which is why I got pulled.

    I explained the situation, he went “fair enough” and gave me a producer. When I took my documents to the police station it transpired that the insurer had issued the policy to start at noon that day, and I got pulled over 20 minutes prior. I’d honestly no idea, I’d have waited if I’d known. I should’ve checked of course, but y’know, new shiny and all that.

    kerley
    Free Member

    Speed clearly makes an accident worse but is not the cause of the accident.

    The cause of all accidents is simply bad driving (driving too close, not paying attention, pulling out in front of other cars, overtaking cyclists on blind bends etc, etc,).

    The problem is nobody is ever going to stop people driving too close (which I would guess is easily over 50% of drivers) and nobody is going to catch people who pull out, don’t pay attention etc,. (well not until they cause an accident).

    Speed is the wrong thing to focus on…

    funkmasterp
    Full Member

    I agree to an extent with what you are saying Kerley. Although speed results in greater stopping distances and affects reaction times. Speed is definitely the reason in a lot of single vehicle incidents. Taking corners or roundabouts too fast etc.

    When it comes to incidents involving third parties I agree that not paying attention, driving too close, poor driving standards is the catalyst. Doing all that at speed just makes a potentially bad accident into a potentially fatal one.

    I suppose speed is the easiest thing to tackle for the authorities. It’s a difficult situation all round to be honest. As stated I have similar views to Matt and Sockpuppet. I didn’t start driving until I was in my thirties and after my brother was killed. Both of these have undoubtedly had an effect on how I drive, more so the latter. I’ve seen first hand the long term and far reaching effects bad driving can have. I drive as carefully and considerately as I can.

    Cougar
    Full Member

    I’m not convinced that speed is as causal as you’re asserting; rather it has a huge impact of the severity of an incident. If people paid attention and generally did all the other things Kerley is suggesting there would be very few accidents indeed. Sadly for that to happen would take a paradigm shift in training and policing. As you say, speed is low-hanging fruit, whack up some cameras, job jobbed. Stopping people tailgating, worrying at Facebook, eating a bowl of cereal (as I saw the other day) requires actual bodies.

    Incidentally, I don’t know if I’ve said this before but I’m genuinely sorry for your loss. I can’t begin to imagine what you and your family must’ve gone through.

Viewing 40 posts - 81 through 120 (of 214 total)

The topic ‘62 points and still on the road’ is closed to new replies.