Having recently gone through the fairly ouchy financial pain of getting a new dynasis 3*10 set up to replace the steadily worn out stuff on my ghost…
got me thinking…
For the past year I have been running 2 bikes, one with 3*10 and with a totally boggo 3*9 setup. For general UK riding about with a bit of xc and enduro racing thrown in.
In that time I honestly cannot say that at any moment any particular gradient made me think, you know if I was on my other bike with its 10 speed rear I would have had a better selection of gears to create better cadence blah blah blah – I think you know what I am saying.
In-fact, while out riding I don’t think I am ever conscious of 9 or 10, just shift into the best gear and go.
Maybe by posting this I am showing my hand as not having sufficient biking sensibilities to appreciate the difference, if so hey ho…
Now, 2*10 yep I can see that. A little bit lighter, a good range of cogs and the ability to go big-big / small-small (right?) with the different spacings.
But 3*10, its just marketing pish isn’t it?
(and expensive to replace!)