Can be worthwhile in that it’s reducing some complexity and maybe improving reliability. Being that 3x you sometimes need more fiddling to get the indexing right or keep it indexed for all three chainrings. 2x is just two front gears to get right. Though I found 2×10 may have bigger jumps between the two rings and shifting is a bit more clunky.
Possibly a weight saving, or maybe not. Depending on the 2x, you may be okay cross chaining (big ring to big ring), whereas it’s not advised with 3x.
If you converted your existing 3x crank you can mount a bash on the front and then two chainrings behind. If you wanted a bash.
If you were going 3×9 to 2×10 then you’ll probably get almost the same gears just with less front rings. 3×10 to 2×10 less so.
Have a play with a gear ratio calculator, like Sheldon’s classic one and see what gears you get out of each set up http://sheldonbrown.com/gears/