Am going to build a 29er, want steel but would consider Alu.
On One is obvious, but I have a 26 scandal. Needs to be rigid or front suspension.
Price point, needs to be sensible, but not above 450.
Looking at Surly, but what else are others riding. I am 6ft, long back and shortish legs, ride an 18 scandal and a Rocky Mountain, not at the same time though.
Triton cycles are selling some bargain salsa and surly frames at the moment. A Salsa Selma Mamasita or El-Mar would be a good buy (check out El-Mar full bike price too!)
Personally, I’d go with the better frame. Wheels wear out or can be updated at a later date.
With the on one frames i’d say the oposite is true. Wheels far more expensive than £150 for a frame and likley to last longer as its cheep enough to swap later on.
I’ve fairly recently built up an Inbred with a Singular Swift fork and I’m very pleased with it. I put my money into a set of Crests on Hope hubs, which I think was the right decision for me.
The frame was bargaintastic at £100. It’s nicely finished and rides really well. It may not have the zing of a Swift or similar but downhill it’s incredible. Really, really rate the Swift fork too.
I’m in the go-with-a-better-frame camp. I had an Inbred, it was good but my Niner is in a different league, even with the same relatively low spec kit. (Rigid forks, Mavic TN719’s on Surly SS wheels). Nothing wrong with the Inbred, but I’d try a Scandal first next time also.
Salsa El Mar here with rigid carbon fork, my first 29er and I can’t fault it. Came from an 26 Inbred which I still use however the El Mar is usually my bike of choice now.
I’ve also gone along the route of buying a cheaper On One 29er SS frame but with a nice wheelset and fork with the idea that if I like the feel of 29ers I will upgrade the frame.
Couple of comments here mentioning the good old ‘zing’ of steel frames. Notably the comparison of Swift and inbred. Does the Swift really have more zing than the inbred? And is the inbred really that much better downhill or riding more technical trails?
+1 for Swift. Can’t compare it to any others as haven’t ridden them. But I love my swift. Have used it rigid/ss, rigid/1×9, hardtail/1×9 so far. ht/ss next. Endless fettling potential and the bike I want to ride every time I go into the garage. Which is a little unfortunate, having lavished my Rocky Mountain Element with new hope hoops & x2 brakes shortly before building the swift. And now the RM sits forlornly in the garage most of the time.
The Swift is a good bit quicker on the climbs and not noticably slower going down on the majority of the stuff I ride – mostly natural + trail centre xc around tweed valley. And the RM ain’t exactly a slouch 🙂
As always a balanced view, no one opinion sticking out more than the others!
Currently loooking to build a rigid 29er with SS and geared option. So looking at frame and fork options. My budget will only cater for inbred or second hand Swift, so trying to decide between the two. After riding a mk1 PA for some time and being a little dissapointed that it didn’t have the steel zing that my 90’s Stumpy had I think i’m looking for some zing….
Mattjg I did wonder if zing was linked to budget… I think the Swift is way prettier than the Inbred and that’s got to account for something! I’ll send you an email about your medium Swift.
Very roughly a zingier bike will have thinner tubes for equivalent strength, which means its made from more expensive material that presumably requires more skill to work with too, so costs rise. But I am no expert.
TBH I found the Inbred and Swift a v similar ride. The Selma is, as Matt says, a rocket ship. Not quite as confident on the downs as my Inbred but that may be because it weighs almost nothing. I’ve been riding rigid SS for a while but I’m fairly new to 29ers and I’m still impressed with how capable my Inbred is every time I ride it.
Cheezpleez – ‘TBH I found the Inbred and Swift a v similar ride’ good to hear – although makes the choice no easier.
‘Not quite as confident on the downs as my Inbred but that may be because it weighs almost nothing‘ This is interesting, as i’ve ridden a couple of lightweight carbon and alu 29ers and felt they were a bit skittish. A slightly ‘better planted’ bike will be better for 90% of the riding I do – after all i’m never going to win any races.
If anyone is in the SW with either inbred or swift I wouldn’t mind trying one out…
I went from Inbred to SIR.9. The Niner is lovely, really does have a suppleness that the Inbred didn’t but I’d happily go back to an Inbred. The Niner certainly isn’t worth 5x the Inbred. The Niner, in terms of feel, reminds me of a Cotic Soul I had once. It’s quite a bit lighter too.
I wouldn’t describe the Selma is skittish, however Cheez does run monster truck tyres on his Inbred, I don’t, so that’s going to change the feel a lot. It is light (with Niner carbon forks on it). Oh yes.