Overview Chat Bike Members News Women
Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 137 total)
1 2 3 4
  • 235 posts about renaming a dead dog? Wow, reckon this'll top 1000 then!
  • TuckerUK
    Free Member

    Why on earth has Russell Crowe had to apologise to people that harm their children? OK, yeah, apart from the fact he works in Hollywoood and it’s practised widely in the US.

    BBC News Story

    And if practising Jews and Muslims themselves don’t even agree on genital mutilation how on earth did he ‘offend the religion’?

    Contrary to the scriptures we don’t marry 9 year olds in the civilised world any more, we don’t stone to death homosexuals any more, why do we allow people to ritualisticly deface their children?

    Posted 12 years ago
    highclimber
    Free Member

    it seems that a lot of personal opinion is being misconstrued as racism/antisemitism/mysogyny etc etc these days and people now, rightly or wrongly, feel the incessant need to self-censor what they say in order to avoid upsetting the minority

    Posted 12 years ago
    yunki
    Free Member

    Romper Stomper

    Posted 12 years ago
    highclimber
    Free Member

    top film

    Posted 12 years ago
    McHamish
    Free Member

    Never mind all that…what’s his dog called?

    Posted 12 years ago
    j_me
    Free Member

    Sambo ?

    Posted 12 years ago
    deadlydarcy
    Free Member

    Darkie?

    Posted 12 years ago
    highclimber
    Free Member

    Sheila

    Posted 12 years ago
    trailmonkey
    Full Member

    he decided to insult as many groups as possible so he called it Abo Hamza

    Posted 12 years ago
    Lifer
    Free Member

    Maddie

    Posted 12 years ago
    grahamh
    Free Member

    Female circumcision was outlawed years ago, so why not the same ruling for boys???

    Posted 12 years ago
    mintimperial
    Full Member

    I suspect that most of the ire directed at Crowe has arisen not because of the religious aspect of this, but because the majority of American males are circumcised. It is standard procedure for them to lop bits off their boys, irrespective of whether it is medically advisable to do so. So when Crowe says “That’s a bit messed up” 85% of US blokes think “Russell Crowe just said I’m barbaric and stupid!” and they kick off as a result. Jewish and Muslim tradition is just a handy stick to beat him with.

    Posted 12 years ago
    AdamW
    Free Member

    Apparently it is a sign for the big ape sky god(s) that you are one of the ‘chosen few’ (AFAIK this is Jewish people and muslims – are there any more religions that chop bits off like that for a laff?).

    Though s/he must be a right perv to demand to see your bits before you enter paradise. “Sorry, you’ve been a fantastic bloke but your tackles still intact. You’re going downstairs!”

    Posted 12 years ago
    Jamie
    Free Member

    I would imagine trying to make a detailed comment about circumcision on twitter must be quite tricky, and you run the risk of your point being cut short…….what with only 140 characters to use.

    Posted 12 years ago
    highclimber
    Free Member

    I personally think circumcision should only be done for medical reasons, not because its part of your religion or creed.

    Posted 12 years ago
    bigyinn
    Free Member

    FWIW its a bit of a non story, although he did issue a grovelling apology the next day IIRC.
    It did make me laugh when someone said circumcision was more hygenic, to which Crowe replied, so you’ll be sewing up your @rsehole then? Top retort.

    Posted 12 years ago
    Northwind
    Full Member

    TuckerUK – Member

    Why on earth has Russell Crowe had to apologise to people that harm their children?

    I presume he’d punched them?

    Posted 12 years ago
    Junkyard
    Free Member

    Culturally tolerated body mutilation but hey lets tolerate it and imagine what zealous atheists would do to a baby’s face with a gay swan.

    Posted 12 years ago
    Lifer
    Free Member

    A gay swan with a muslamic ray gun?

    Posted 12 years ago
    deadlydarcy
    Free Member

    I feel strangely attracted to those smooth willies on pron sites though. 🙂

    Posted 12 years ago
    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    we don’t stone to death homosexuals any more, why do we allow people to ritualisticly deface their children?

    It’s a bit rude to guys who have had to be circumcised, for whatever reason, to claim that they have been “defaced”.

    I agree that it is comparable to stoning homosexuals to death though…….you’re spot on there mate.

    Posted 12 years ago
    kimbers
    Full Member

    circumcision can reduce the risk of contracting hiv

    other than that its a bit pointless really

    Posted 12 years ago
    Jamie
    Free Member

    I feel strangely attracted to those smooth willies on pron sites though.

    We have much to discuss!

    Posted 12 years ago
    deadlydarcy
    Free Member

    They just look so shiny!!

    Posted 12 years ago
    trailmonkey
    Full Member

    I feel strangely attracted to those smooth willies on pron sites though

    on reflection dd, is that something that you really wanted to share

    Posted 12 years ago
    bigyinn
    Free Member

    kimbers – Member

    circumcision can reduce the risk of contracting hiv
    How?

    Posted 12 years ago
    CharlieMungus
    Free Member

    other than that its a bit pointless really

    🙂

    apart from the pun, in contrast to female circumcision it actually has positive effects in terms of sexual pleasure. The exposed glans becomes less sensitive and allows the circumcised guy to last longer

    Posted 12 years ago
    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    The exposed glans becomes less sensitive and allows the circumcised guy to last longer

    Thinking of Anne Widdecombe can have the same effect without the need for such drastic action.

    Posted 12 years ago
    SurroundedByZulus
    Free Member

    bigyinn – Member

    kimbers – Member

    circumcision can reduce the risk of contracting hiv

    How?

    Is it due to potential sexual partners falling over laughing at the sight of a leather helmet?

    I would say that circumcision would increase the likelihood of a skinned/chafed helmet therefore increasing the risk of hiv.

    As for the increased sexual pleasure thing – why on earth would you want to desensitise your glans? Pelvic floor exercises would be a much better way of increasing staying power without mutilation.

    Posted 12 years ago
    TuckerUK
    Free Member

    you run the risk of your point being cut short…

    sniggers

    Posted 12 years ago
    kimbers
    Full Member

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21114567

    its a pretty well established fact the why is not so sure, as i understood it antigen presenting cells only come to the surface of your skin on the undeside of the foreskin and HIV works by attacking immune system cells like apcs

    Posted 12 years ago
    TuckerUK
    Free Member

    It’s a bit rude to guys who have had to be circumcised, for whatever reason, to claim that they have been “defaced”.

    I see your point, but I don’t agree. Just as I don’t think it would be rude to genuine amputees to described children that have limbs removed for some sacrifice as ‘defaced’.

    Posted 12 years ago
    TuckerUK
    Free Member

    apart from the pun, in contrast to female circumcision it actually has positive effects in terms of sexual pleasure. The exposed glans becomes less sensitive and allows the circumcised guy to last longer

    I can last as long as I need to, so that’s that argument down the pan.

    Posted 12 years ago
    SurroundedByZulus
    Free Member

    [video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCa5u2ayevo&feature=related[/video]

    Posted 12 years ago
    Jamie
    Free Member

    I wish you had linked to a vid of an actual circumcision op SBZ, at least it would be funnier.

    BOOM! Take that Hale & Pace!

    Posted 12 years ago
    deadlydarcy
    Free Member

    on reflection dd, is that something that you really wanted to share

    🙂

    Ah well, too late for the edit now 😕

    Posted 12 years ago
    CharlieMungus
    Free Member

    I can last as long as I need to, so that’s that argument down the pan.

    You do know that anecdote is not the singular of evidence, don’t you?

    Posted 12 years ago
    TuckerUK
    Free Member

    You do know that anecdote is not the singular of evidence, don’t you?

    Not sure, you hum it and I’ll join in when I can.

    Posted 12 years ago
    TheBrick
    Free Member

    deface their children?

    I see what you did there.

    Posted 12 years ago
    TuckerUK
    Free Member

    I can last as long as I need to, so that’s that argument down the pan.

    You do know that anecdote is not the singular of evidence, don’t you?

    You’re coming on to me aren’t you? Steady tiger! Not that I’m not flattered mind you, but I kinda prefer the ladies myself, nothing personal.

    Posted 12 years ago
Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 137 total)
1 2 3 4

The topic ‘235 posts about renaming a dead dog? Wow, reckon this'll top 1000 then!’ is closed to new replies.

Overview Chat Bike Members News Women