- This topic has 46 replies, 31 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by scaredypants.
-
£175,000
-
CaptainFlashheartFree MemberPosted 13 years ago
When one considers that a soccer player in the news this morning was due to be paid £175,000 a week, all of a sudden those banker’s bonuses don’t seem to be that big a deal, really, do they.
Where are the demanding howls for a Robin Hood tax on the soccer industry, eh? 😉
jon1973Free MemberPosted 13 years agoWhere are the demanding howls for a Robin Hood tax on the soccer industry, eh?
I know what you mean, but we can’t really blame footballers for bringing the county’s financial system to it’s knees.
That is a ridiculous amount of money though (translates as – I wish I could earn that much).
johnnersFree MemberPosted 13 years agoWhen one considers that a soccer player in the news this morning was due to be paid £175,000 a week, all of a sudden those banker’s bonuses don’t seem to be that big a deal, really, do they.
Are you trying to suggest that another bunch being overpaid somehow justifies the banker’s bonuses? Tosh.
steve_b77Free MemberPosted 13 years agoIf you subscribe to sky sports or indeed sky, you can’t complain about what they earn IMHO
Also got to agree, no footballer has ruined the banking set up, sent fuel prices spiralling almost out of control or not ploughed stupid amounts if money into the luxury housing/car market. Most of them also pay a boat load if tax every week on those astronomical wages
vinnyehFull MemberPosted 13 years agoMost of them also pay a boat load if tax every week on those astronomical wages
iDaveFree MemberPosted 13 years agofootballers who are unsuccessful are not paid well. bankers who fail are rewarded despite failure. and footballers aren’t gambling with our money on a daily basis, thinking that they know what they’re doing.
big_n_daftFree MemberPosted 13 years agoMost of them also pay a boat load if tax every week on those astronomical wages
rubbish, most of the cash will be for “image rights”
glenpFree MemberPosted 13 years agoYou miss the whole point – banks know that they can take huge risks and the rest of us will bail them out when it all goes boobs-up. It isn’t the amount of money, it’s the fact that we ordinary folk have to bail them out, and at the same time the arrogant (insert favourite word) simultaneously think they’re better than us.
Footballers’ wages is just a fact of capitalist life. Same as pop stars or actors.
PeaslakeDaveFree MemberPosted 13 years agoabout 60 to 65% of footballers wages will go to the government by tax
matt_outandaboutFull MemberPosted 13 years agoabout 60 to 65% of footballers wages will go to the government by tax
No, no they won’t. Tax
evasionavoidance is used a lot.igmFull MemberPosted 13 years agoFootballers – round ’em up and shoot ’em, they’ll be guilty of something.
iDaveFree MemberPosted 13 years agoFootballersBankers – round ’em up and shoot ’em, they’ll be guilty of something.jon1973Free MemberPosted 13 years agoFootballers – round ’em up and shoot ’em, they’ll be guilty of something.
That’s what I like to see; a no nonsense approach to crime and punishment.
DezBFree MemberPosted 13 years agoIn addition to the above – how long is the average footballer’s career?
JamieFree MemberPosted 13 years agoDepends, a lot go into other areas of the industry. Management, training etc.
jon1973Free MemberPosted 13 years agoFootballers BankersTraffic Wardens – round ’em up and shoot ’em, they’ll be guilty of something.mastiles_fanylionFree MemberPosted 13 years agovinnyeh – Member
Most of them also pay a boat load if tax every week on those astronomical wages
Really?The poster did say MOST
IdleJonFull MemberPosted 13 years agoSame as pop stars or actors.
There never seems to be any surprise that a person would get paid such a huge amount to read some lines out badly in a blockbuster movie. Often the only talent that actor might have is to look pretty. At least footballers have a talent, of sorts.
DezBFree MemberPosted 13 years agoDepends, a lot go into other areas of the industry. Management, training etc
On the same wages?
DezBFree MemberPosted 13 years agoAnyway, what’s the bloody point of comparing sportsmen/entertainers wages with bankers?
A: There isn’t one.xiphonFree MemberPosted 13 years agoDon’t buy a match ticket, pay for Sky Sports, or buy products endorsed by them.
Simple.
RustySpannerFull MemberPosted 13 years agoAny figures to show us yet on the supposed economic benefits of the Forestry sell
outoff yet Flashy?And as to your original question:
When a team gets relegated, we’re not all forced to contribute to the maintenance of the players salaries.
No has to watch football. We have to use banks.
But of course, you knew all that anyway.
You seem like a decent bloke Flashy – you must be really embarrassed by the behaviour of the Eton Mess – Forestry sell off, scrapping of Ark Royal, the Harrier Fleet and the Nimrod programme?
Come and join the Labour Party! They let all sorts in these days 🙂
RustySpannerFull MemberPosted 13 years agoWell he comes across as far more pleasant than some of the relentlessly negative, nasty, sneeringly cynical no-marks that occasionally inhabit this place.
Whoever he is.
Surprised he’s a Tory really, but there’s no accounting for accidents of birth. 🙂
ernie_lynchFree MemberPosted 13 years agoCaptainFlashheart – Member
…..those banker’s bonuses don’t seem to be that big a deal, really, do they.
Your mate George Osborne doesn’t agree with you Flash, in fact he reckons banker’s bonuses are a really big deal. This is what he has said about “those banker’s bonuses” :
“When it comes to the Government and the banks, surely the public are entitled to ask why the Government talk tough and make promises, but then fail to deliver. As we wait to see bonus payments over the coming months, we will remember the Prime Minister’s promise that the era of the big bonus is over.”
Obviously he said that when he was in opposition, not when he was in government and could actually do something about it.
trailmonkeyFull MemberPosted 13 years agoJust think Flash, most of them come from really crappy council estates too.
BetHope that really hacks you off.footflapsFull MemberPosted 13 years agoSTWers
Footballersround ’em up and shoot ’em, they’ll be guilty of something.SpongebobFree MemberPosted 13 years agoWhen one considers that a soccer player in the news this morning was due to be paid £175,000 a week, all of a sudden those banker’s bonuses don’t seem to be that big a deal, really, do they.
Don’t they?
So £75,000,000,000 is a small sum of money?
How about £3Bn? Yes, your read it right! An american hedge fund manager made this amount.
Footballers are well overpaid. Their salaries are offensive to decent hard working people, but in the grand scheme of things, they are not at the top of the tree by any stretch of the imagination.
People like Phillip Green do much better, especially when they transfer assets to their spouse who live in tax havens to avoid paying millions in tax!
We’re all in it together mind!
StuMcGrooFree MemberPosted 13 years agovinnyeh
Most of them also pay a boat load if tax every week on those astronomical wages
Really?
yes really… as employees of football clubs, players are on paye so they pay all the tax due on their salary’s and any appearance bonus. of the £250,000 a week rooney receives from man utd he probably sees less than half.
the bit in the press above relates to the fees the players get outside of their employment for product endorsements etc, that is effectively self employment so they can be more creative with accounting.
there’s not really any comparison between footballers salaries and bankers bonus’s, the football clubs are private companies whereas we own most of the banks!
IdleJonFull MemberPosted 13 years agothe football clubs are private companies whereas we own most of the banks!
And football clubs don’t send me letters which cost me a squillion pounds for going a penny overdrawn.
donsimonFree MemberPosted 13 years agoHow many people pay to be entertained by a footballer week in week out, surely a cut of that isn’t a big issue?
john_drummerFree MemberPosted 13 years agoI can’t imagine too many players outside the Premier League’s “more fashionable” clubs will be earning that kind of money; let’s say top 10 for the sake of argument (I can’t imagine too many players at Blackpool, Wigan or Stoke will be on that much, for example).
Now let’s consider the playing squad of Premier League teams is restricted to 25 senior players, and not all of them will be on anywhere near that. Let’s call it half of each team’s squad.
That’s 125-130 England-based players IN TOTAL earning that kind of money. How does that stack up against bankers’ bonuses now?
chakapingFree MemberPosted 13 years agoWhere are the demanding howls for a Robin Hood tax on the soccer industry, eh?
That’s a very good idea, and it’d be a huge vote-winner – since the people in question are mainly foreign anyway.
Have you talked to Dave about it?
oscillatewildlyFree MemberPosted 13 years agodont usually like to get involved in these types of threads, but i can tell you footballers are ploughing at least half of their wages back into the country week in week out…so yes they may be overpaid, and quite frankly some of them are a disgrace to football, but to compare them to bankers is absolutly awful!
football clubs are run privately, therefore the monies spent is the owners, not the tax payer…mr rooney then gets 250k a week, and probably see’s around 125k of that after paye and national insurance….even the amount left is ridiculous!
the difference being, we have a choice on the wages of footballers (if we all decided, not to go and not buy merchandise etc etc watch sky sports) then they wouldnt receive them, as there would be no market…
bankers, are now controlled mainly by the government, still earning stupid wages, and still earning shockingly massive bonuses for fooooking up the countries finances!
so footballers (who are massively overpaid dont get me wrong) are ploughing money back into the country week in week out, and giving enjoyment to millions over the world VS. bankers who no body can stand, earn money that they are not entitled too and give no enjoyment to a single soul other than themselves and their families…
fair comparison!?!?!??!?!? i think not!
😆
ernie_lynchFree MemberPosted 13 years agobut to compare them to bankers is absolutly awful!
Not if you’re a posh toff what loves greedy bankers and hates lower-class sport it ain’t.
IainGillamFree MemberPosted 13 years agoiDave – Member
footballers who are unsuccessful are not paid well. bankers who fail are rewarded despite failure. and footballers aren’t gambling with our money on a daily basis, thinking that they know what they’re doing.POSTED 6 HOURS AGO # REPORT-POST
Depends on your definition of fail, a banker who looses money for their employer will not be on the pay roll for long at all. And the amount of graduates fresh out of top universities with 1st class degrees queuing up to take that job off them is endless.
Iain
oscillatewildlyFree MemberPosted 13 years agoernie_lynch – Member
but to compare them to bankers is absolutly awful!
Not if you’re a posh toff what loves greedy bankers and hates lower-class sport it ain’t
its still not a great comparison though is it? ones a sport, one isnt….
at the end of the day, if i was a banker and a big wig offered me a £500k bonus, i for one would not turn it down….and equally if i was told id be payed £250k a week to play something i love doing, then again i would not turn that down either….
so people who take the moral high ground need to take a long hard look and say, would i complain if i was earning that?!?!?! i think not, nor do i think you would give a toss what some rambling morons think on a cycle forum 😆 😆
johnnersFree MemberPosted 13 years agoNot if you’re a posh toff what loves greedy bankers and hates lower-class sport it ain’t
CaptainFlashheart a posh toff? Nonsense, he’s just made up, like the rest of us!
The topic ‘£175,000’ is closed to new replies.
