so your view is that all UKIP members should be banned from fostering as their views will conciously or unconciously damage the self image of immgrant children in their care, or conciously or unconciously pass on their views to non-immigrant children in their care

Yup.

Do you think if the foster parents were really racist they would be happily fostering foreign children?

Just because one of UKIP’s policies is they believe there should be tighter controls on immigration doesn’t mean it’s supporters are racist or even against some immigration for that matter.

It’s common sense, this country is full to capacity but unfortunately anyone who states the obvious is branded a racist by the PC lunatics. The irony is many of the most vociferous critics that the UK’s immigration is out of control are the first wave immigrants themselves.

I reckon statistically UKIP members are more likely to be prejudiced, so they were making the right call in the interests of the children.

But nooo, it’s all about the poor little UKIPers….not the kids.

Using your warped argument could we not also say that Pakistani men are more likely to rape children therefore they should not be allowed to adopt white kids, or teach them or be within 100m of them etc.?

Er, no.

I guess you’re probably trolling on your lunch break at Rotherham council. Get back to your desk they’ll be round shortly with your P45

Police issue cautions, no need for CPS involvement.

That makes more sense. Thanks.

With an example of something that you thought was true.

My “warped arguments” are evidenced in peer reviewed literature, which I’m sure you’d understand if you went away and performed journal searches.

Pakistani men are more likely to degrade women generally, I’m afraid that’s a fact and none believers well I wouldn’t think they’d worry too much what happens to them.

Interesting point on the radio though. One ‘complaint’ against Cliff Richard v 1400 complaints by homeless kids as far as reaction by our dearly beloved Police Force seems just a tad out of kilter.

But, there are also issues ‘controlling’ these kids at the homes they are in, they get out, they are vulnerable, want to be seen as worthwhile, some bastard buys them a drink tells them they’re his girlfriend, it’s a shoe in and very difficult for the actual social service types on the ground to deal with, until there is a complaint and in that case, it is squarely the fault of the police for not acting.

As for the cultural thing it’s a nightmare, we have become the focal point for escapees from almost every trouble spot in the world, even my sleepy town as nightly inter factional fights between Afghans and Kosovans, presumably Sunni v Shia, I don’t know, but you can bet your life they treat the opposite sect in every bit the same way they’d treat indigenous girls of any colour so it’s not only racially motivated.

Strewth – and still it goes on.

Tom_W1987 – are you a real person, or has someone finally worked out an algorithm to generate obtuse, blustering, yet seemingly (at face value) on-topic double-speak? If so, I particularly like the way this algorithm can respond to every question whilst eventually looping back to the same discredited opinion.

Maybe this algorithm has only just made it into the public domain having previously only been employed by politicians?

Whatever is going on here, you are obviously crystal clear in your convictions. This is (at least partly) to be admired.

The only problem is that your convictions, when applied to this example, are leading to you denying the bleeding obvious.

It would be funny in another context, but in this case it isn’t. Not remotely.

[video]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGZrdh0fJyU[/video]

Tom_1987 in action earlier………..

🙄

Ahhh deportation of political enemies, the resort of fascists.

I reckon if I was a bit racisty (just a little bit), a bit right wing, a bit bigoty, I’d wring my hands a bit more about political correctness and it being the cause of abuse continuing to happen. I’d probably take the word of those who allowed it to continue because they were afraid of the PC Brigade (whoever they are) at face value, without question. That would suit my agenda.

DD nail/head.

For none of that, for saying that Pakistanis are more likely to sexually abuse girls. An unfounded accusation which reveals his true self.

I was about to flame Lifer till I saw the “/” 😀

Look, I’m as horrified by the stories as the next guy, but wwaswas ^ elucidates my point perfectly. It’s an awfully convenient excuse for not doing one’s job. “Oh, the PC Brigade was doing an inspection downstairs so I just sort of rearranged my “to investigate” list to make sure we were concentrating on taking children from white heterosexual smoking males instead of on Pakistani Taxi Drivers raping young girls.” I’m surprised it’s being accepted without question by so many. 😐

You then went off into hysteria-mode, played the racist card, and bish bash bosh, here we are!

A point you made to try and counter my UKIP racism troll, unfortunately it turned out I have some evidence to back up my claim.

“A study I co-authored last year with Matthew Goodwin and David Cutts took a look at the attitudes and preferences of a large sample of over 4,000 Ukip voters gathered just after the 2009 European Parliament elections – Ukip’s biggest electoral triumph to date. We looked at British voters’ attitudes towards immigrants, Muslims and ethnic minorities, and in each case we found the same thing: Ukip were less likely to hold intolerant views than the BNP, but more likely than the supporters of any of the three maintream parties. I’ll take them in turn.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/robert-ford/are-ukip-supporters-racist_b_2193055.html

Where as you made a claim that does not have any evidence to back it up, as such, it was derived from racist thinking.

Nope, I just automatically assume everyone else is wrong.

Alas we didn’t get as far as China. No it was used to denote the social changes in the UK in the late 50s and 60s (the pill, change to divorce laws, changes to crime and punishment legislation). I think the term “social revolution” was also used.

Ahhhh it’s a shame women got more power over their own bodies and lives.

I bet you’d love living in Saudi Arabia.

Also, don’t take me personally. I love a good argument, the racism accusation wasn’t entirely meant.

Factor. Indeed.

Which of course suggests it’s not the only thing at play here. And, as subjective an opinion as this is, I don’t believe it’s as big a factor as those who live under the oppressive shadow of the PC Brigade want to think.