Viewing 40 posts - 81 through 120 (of 128 total)
  • 1 x 11 – not convinced
  • Superficial
    Free Member

    So it isn’t so much about how steep the climbs are but about how long your rides are.

    If there’s a downside to 1×9 or 10, then this is it. It’s much better for hammering around stuff fast for an hour or two IMO. Partly that’s down to fitness, but it’s also down to the fact that it requires you to pedal a bit harder to get up stuff. Sometimes that’s an advantage because you’ll carry more momentum. On the whole I’d say I climb quicker with 1×10, and get up all the same climbs, but the pace might tire me out a bit sooner. SRAM 1×11 (and to a lesser extent, Shimano 1×11 and Ghetto 1×10 with range expanders) goes a long way to correct that, though. Depending on what front sprocket you choose, you still have a very usable range.

    As for it being a problem in the Lakes, well that’s a load of balls IME. I guess it depends where you ride, but for me the Lakes is about the high Fells and riding some big exposed stuff. To that end most of my recent Lakes rides have involved a lot of walking where I might as well have been single speed. I’m sure 1x is good for trail centres, but I wouldn’t know 😉

    thegreatape
    Free Member

    I am with the OP. 1 x 10/11 is fashion led. ok for trail center stuff that the blokes who like it ride. places like the lakes Highlands where proper mtb riders frequent, it is nigh on useless. absolutely fine and quite popular
    good old 3 x 9 was and still is far better. fine
    and don’t quote the weight saving crap…..most men can afford to lose a stone or 2. adding the weight of a front mech/shifter/ring mean nil. Just 2 🙂

    mboy
    Free Member

    Anyone else on here long for the heady old days of this forum when the standard answers to any questions were “32:16” or “Conti Vert Pro’s”??? 😕

    Marin
    Free Member

    Got 1×11 on the new ride seems to cope with N.Wales and the Alps quite well. Don’t talk. Get your cadence. Enjoy the climb.

    jamesoz
    Full Member

    Never liked front mechs off road, they are big mud magnets and haven’t had a usable granny gear on a bike since 1999. The clutch mech and narrow wide ring are great inventions as far as I’m concerned. Slack and low geometry however..

    andyrm
    Free Member

    A “not proper” mountain biker and his 1×11 drivetrain recently:

    whatnobeer
    Free Member

    30 into 11 is a bit too low for most as a top gear.

    For some, maybe, but for most? At 120 rpm you’d be doing 25mph and I suspect if you’re doing that speed your either on the road or easy double track. If you’re still wanting to pedal at 25mph and not riding something easy then kudos, but you’re not most people.

    mactheknife
    Full Member

    Plus the cost is crazy and those posh cassettes don’t last two minutes, or so I hear. So what’s the deal?

    I was on the verge of heading off to do something more productive but i thought i would reply tho this one.

    Posh cassette 😛 i will admit to spending a fair whack on a complete X01 drivetrain with no real expectations on how it would perform. I had the money to burn after a refund from a set of carbon hoops that kept committing suicide on top of very high mountains.

    So 18 months down the line this is where i am at, i am still on the same cassette. I am on the 3rd chain and the second front chainring which i dropped down for hitting the mountains this summer 🙂 yea i know.

    In that time i have ridden shed loads. 2 week long holidays. 2 week long multi stage events with trans in the title. and lots and lots of normal riding. I dont have the exact figure but its lots 🙂

    On that basis alone i don’t think it is fair to say they last 2 minutes. If you take care of the drivetrain it will last. It really is not rocket science. And change the chain out before it really trashes the cassette.

    Oh and before i forget as i said i was very open to accepting the disadvantages and advantages of the system, for the riding i do its pretty much a perfect solution. Simplicity it where its at. If you ride mountainous terrain all the time i think a 2 x 10 may benefit you more but for me i see no real disadvantages to 1 x 11

    Radioman
    Full Member

    I cannot achieve anything like 120 RPM, and haven’t often witnessed anyone doing that!!(I might add I use flats so maybe I’m not pedal efficient!) . I rarely pedal downhill that much and don’t do competitive downhill. Im just a fun rider and get up to 17-20mph max on what I enjoy. I prefer a “reasonable sized ” 32+ up front so I can still kick on the pedal to help lift the front for manuals and getting over rocks and going off drops. I don’t often do that in the 11t rear sprocket and would be in the middle of the block. Shimano fitted 32t middle rings for years. I guess as lots of people(most?) like that. Therein is the answer.

    Nobeerinthefridge
    Free Member

    For some, maybe, but for most? At 120 rpm you’d be doing 25mph and I suspect if you’re doing that speed your either on the road or easy double track. If you’re still wanting to pedal at 25mph and not riding something easy then kudos, but you’re not most people.

    Exactly. I have a 32 on 26″FS and a 30 on the 29″FS, and the only time I ever run out of gears is on the long boring road sections between some of my local trails, which doesn’t bother me tbh.

    Radioman
    Full Member

    Im very happy with 32 too…just wouldn’t want a 30. Anyway we can all do as we please. One day i’ll be moving to 11 or whatever speed they offer. My first “decent” MTB was a rubbish by today’s standards non indexed 6 speed and each time they have increased block sizes things have got better as they have also improved shifting beyond recognition.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    At 120 rpm you’d be doing 25mph and I suspect if you’re doing that speed your either on the road or easy double track.

    That’s why I still have 3×9 on the Salsa – it does road.

    haven’t had a usable granny gear on a bike since 1999

    Why on earth not?

    wonkey_donkey
    Free Member

    Does anyone race XC on 1×11? I’m speccing up a group set for a XC race bike and am currently in a “land of confusion”
    As to which way to go.
    I like the faff free front mech and bars simplicity of it all but worried I’ll be out of gears on a fast flat course or a mass sprint start.

    Any XC racers running 1×11 – or not, got any input?

    jamj1974
    Full Member

    ok for trail center stuff that the blokes who like it ride. places like the lakes where proper mtb riders frequent, it is nigh on useless.

    Well, it worked well enough for me doing some fairly long, high-altitude steep alpine climbing a few weeks ago and I am overweight and unfit at the moment.

    good old 3 x 9 was and still is far better

    Rode 3×9 for years,however, it was not as good as 3×8 or 3×10 (or 2×10) – both of which seemed to set up better, wear more well and were ‘crisper’.

    molgrips
    Free Member

    I had 2×9 in 2001 when such things were unheard of – I had an early Middleburn XC duo. I rather liked the fact I didn’t have to shift the front anything like as often, so I imagine 1×10 would be even better. On an XC course with much more flat out hammering I think it’d be great not having to pause for front shifting and risk chainsuck/dropping the chain.

    scotroutes
    Full Member

    I have a pile of 2×11 bits waiting for the matching cranks and a frame to fit them on. For me, hilly bikepacking benefits from a decent low and top end and 1x just doesn’t provide enough range.

    EhWhoMe
    Full Member

    For those wondering about the importance of chain line and suspension..i think my dw turner suspension feels different in different front rings..which i think its how its meant to be

    http://dw-link.blogspot.co.uk/2008/10/single-chainrings-and-detrimental.html

    mactheknife
    Full Member

    What I don’t get is the narrow-wide chainrings as the bash guard is then lost. Even just hopping the bike over a typical horse step gate thing risks trashing the ring and chain, let alone proper riding?

    Blackspire bruiser, protects the chain and front ring.

    ok for trail center stuff that the blokes who like it ride. places like the lakes where proper mtb riders frequent, it is nigh on useless.

    Pish, complete and utter pish. Whoever wrote that need’s to have a long hard look at themselves. Stop generalising. There is no getting away from the fact that we all like different types of kit and not everything is one size fits all. As i stated before my thinking is that if you ride in the mountains nearly all the time then 2 x 10 with a clutch mech is the ultimate solution, but 1 x 11 is very very close. And thats not just from my experience but from a lot of very capable riders i have met on my travels.

    nikk
    Free Member

    All this belly button examination regarding one set of gears vs another slightly smaller range of gears 😆

    How do folk on singlespeeds manage to ride? How do they manage to win 560 mile highland mountain bike races? With one gear!

    Pick what makes sense to you, and enjoy. Note: it is likely that someone else will pick something different, and also enjoy!

    nikk
    Free Member

    ok for trail center stuff that the blokes who like it ride. places like the lakes where proper mtb riders frequent, it is nigh on useless.

    Pish, complete and utter pish. Whoever wrote that need’s to have a long hard look at themselves. Stop generalising. There is no getting away from the fact that we all like different types of kit and not everything is one size fits all.

    I think (hope) that Ton was trolling for amusement there. I don’t think it worked very well TBH and is likely throwing the thread, which will now no doubt go on for another 10 pages with people giving death threats over whether 32 tooth chainrings are better than 34s 😉

    jamesoz
    Full Member

    @Molgrips I think you answered your own question. No chain suck, also tyre/mech/mud clearance.

    mactheknife
    Full Member

    Haha, well i bit good and proper 🙂

    cRaNkEnStEin
    Free Member

    1 x 1. That’s a proper bike 🙂

    mmannerr
    Full Member

    Choice was made for me, apparently I have inherited dodgy knees which seem to like 2x more than 1x solutions. It is not the extremes at 30×36 but using granny for longer climbs and especially after 2 hours granny really makes a difference in post-ride pain.

    I’d still enjoy continuity of 1x solution but not riding only every other week and spending others in armchair with ice packs on my knees. 🙁

    jamj1974
    Full Member

    I think it’d be great not having to pause for front shifting and risk chainsuck/dropping the chain.

    as you overtake people on the trail…? 😉

    molgrips
    Free Member

    How do they manage to win 560 mile highland mountain bike races? With one gear!

    We will never know how fast he would’ve been with gears…..

    nikk
    Free Member

    We will never know how fast he would’ve been with gears…..

    Right, but it doesn’t matter how much faster he would or wouldn’t have been with gears. The fact is, he put a stonking good time in and won, with only one gear. That’s on a course that includes some of the hardest MTB riding in the UK.

    ton
    Full Member

    just go in from fitting a 28 tooth front and 42 tooth expander to my enduro.
    if you cant beat em, join em eh…….. 😀

    nikk
    Free Member

    Mind, just trail centers from now on ton!

    RustySpanner
    Full Member

    SPLITTER!

    thegreatape
    Free Member

    28×42 – you’ll topple over going that slow 😉

    ton
    Full Member

    cant wait to shred dalby…. 😆

    fibre
    Free Member

    Here’s what I’ve used so far…
    3×8
    1×8
    3×9
    2×9
    1×9
    2×10
    1×10
    1×10 with expander
    and finally 1×11

    I’m sticking with 1×11, 11-42 34 on 29er. There’s plenty of gear range for all day rides, the steepest of climbs, fast trails\road and once descents get really fast you may as well get low\aero.

    I’ve found some people will never have enough gears, despite someone with less gears (or even one gear) riding the same stuff with no problems and faster.

    ballsofcottonwool
    Free Member

    I’ve been on 1×8 since I crashed and smashed my front shifter 3 years ago.
    36t x 11-32 was fine on the Moray coast but since moving to Aberdeenshire where the typical climb had hundreds of meters as opposed to tens of metres of ascent I’ve dropped my gearing to 30t x 12-36 which is low enough until it’s time to get off and walk.

    zippykona
    Full Member

    When someone invents a 9 tooth cog,I will be in business.

    cubicboy
    Free Member

    Have had 2 x 10 on my past two bikes and am a pretty decent climber. Have just bought a new bike with XX1 and a 32t chainring. The big difference for me is the very lowest gear; I can’t remember the exact ratio but my new lowest gear is equivalent to my second lowest on my 2 x 10. I did the Scott Marathon recently and there was stuff that I would normally get up that I just couldn’t manage. Perhaps a lot of that was very tired legs but it came as a surprise. I am getting used to it though.

    chiefgrooveguru
    Full Member

    When I returned to MTBing I read a really good comment about pedalling, that you want your legs to be like a well tuned small-block V8, able to turn fast and powerful AND slow and strong, rather than like a high revving F1 engine or grunting truck diesel.

    I’m far from an XC racer but that attitude has stuck with me, so I can stomp a relatively big gear up a steep climb and spin a relatively small one to quite a speed downhill. I suspect that’s why I’m happy with 1×10 and I suspect riders who are sceptical of going 1x are those who prefer to pedal a narrower cadence range (though SRAM 1×11 is much wider range than stock 1×10).

    I’ll try doing some cadence counting on my next ride, I’m curious to know my working range…

    cookeaa
    Full Member

    When someone invents a 9 tooth cog,I will be in business.

    Shimano already did, look up their ‘capreo’ groupset… And of course then there’s the hope cassette that never actually made it to market…

    “New ideas” for cycling kit seem to take about eight years to a decade or so to turn into ‘mainstream products’…

    molgrips
    Free Member

    Right, but it doesn’t matter how much faster he would or wouldn’t have been with gears

    Well it does if you are suggesting that one gear is faster.. 🙂

    nikk
    Free Member

    Right, but it doesn’t matter how much faster he would or wouldn’t have been with gears

    Well it does if you are suggesting that one gear is faster..

    I wasn’t suggesting that. What I am saying is someone was able to not only complete, but win, that race, over hard mountain terrain, over multiple days, with just one gear. Therefore, the assertion that you need multiple gears to do ‘proper mountain biking’ is demonstrably false. And by extension, that a slightly limited set of gears ala 1xn should not be any handicap to a lot of MTB riding for a fair percentage of people.

Viewing 40 posts - 81 through 120 (of 128 total)

The topic ‘1 x 11 – not convinced’ is closed to new replies.